California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill ACR148 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 148 CHAPTER 159Relative to the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. [ Filed with Secretary of State August 30, 2022. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 148, ODonnell. Long Beach International Gateway Bridge.This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost for appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs. Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES Bill TextWHEREAS, The City of Long Beach is the seventh most populous city in California and serves as a major cultural and economic center in the Gateway Cities region; andWHEREAS, The City of Long Beach is home to the Port of Long Beach, the second largest container port in the United States, moving 8,100,000 containers worth of cargo in 2020; andWHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach serves as a local, regional, and statewide economic engine with a direct and statewide economic impact of $28.9 billion to Californias gross domestic product in 2017; andWHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach supports 2,600,000 jobs throughout the United States that are dependent on trade traveling through the port, as well as directly supporting 576,000 jobs in the five-county southern California region alone; andWHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach was connected to the nations highway system through the Gerald Desmond Bridge that saw 15 percent of all containerized cargo imported into the United States cross its length during the peak of its use; andWHEREAS, The Gerald Desmond Bridge was not designed to accommodate this level of traffic going over it, or modern container ships passing under it, with the bridges maximum vertical clearance of only 155 feet; andWHEREAS, To better serve this significant amount of economic traffic, the Port of Long Beach has partnered with the Department of Transportation, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and the United States Department of Transportation to initiate the Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project (project); andWHEREAS, The project has led to the construction of a new bridge to better accommodate the passage of the 68,000 vehicles expected to cross it every day; andWHEREAS, This replacement bridge also provides up to 205 feet of clearance for the massive container ships passing under the bridge; andWHEREAS, This new bridge should carry a name that reflects the role the bridge plays in economically connecting the City of Long Beach and the United States to the rest of the world through the Port of Long Beach; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature hereby designates the portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach, from post mile R3.773 to post mile R5.452R, covering the full length of State Bridge number 53-3000, as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge; and be it furtherResolved, That the Department of Transportation is requested to determine the cost of erecting appropriate signs, consistent with the signing requirements for the state highway system, showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Director of Transportation and to the author for appropriate distribution.
1+Enrolled August 25, 2022 Passed IN Senate August 23, 2022 Passed IN Assembly April 28, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 148Introduced by Assembly Member ODonnell(Principal coauthor: Senator Gonzalez)(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bennett, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Mia Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Choi, Cooper, Cunningham, Megan Dahle, Daly, Davies, Flora, Fong, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Nazarian, Nguyen, Patterson, Petrie-Norris, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Seyarto, Smith, Stone, Ting, Valladares, Villapudua, Voepel, Waldron, Ward, Akilah Weber, Wicks, Wilson, and Wood)February 18, 2022Relative to the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 148, ODonnell. Long Beach International Gateway Bridge.This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost for appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs. Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES Bill TextWHEREAS, The City of Long Beach is the seventh most populous city in California and serves as a major cultural and economic center in the Gateway Cities region; andWHEREAS, The City of Long Beach is home to the Port of Long Beach, the second largest container port in the United States, moving 8,100,000 containers worth of cargo in 2020; andWHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach serves as a local, regional, and statewide economic engine with a direct and statewide economic impact of $28.9 billion to Californias gross domestic product in 2017; andWHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach supports 2,600,000 jobs throughout the United States that are dependent on trade traveling through the port, as well as directly supporting 576,000 jobs in the five-county southern California region alone; andWHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach was connected to the nations highway system through the Gerald Desmond Bridge that saw 15 percent of all containerized cargo imported into the United States cross its length during the peak of its use; andWHEREAS, The Gerald Desmond Bridge was not designed to accommodate this level of traffic going over it, or modern container ships passing under it, with the bridges maximum vertical clearance of only 155 feet; andWHEREAS, To better serve this significant amount of economic traffic, the Port of Long Beach has partnered with the Department of Transportation, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and the United States Department of Transportation to initiate the Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project (project); andWHEREAS, The project has led to the construction of a new bridge to better accommodate the passage of the 68,000 vehicles expected to cross it every day; andWHEREAS, This replacement bridge also provides up to 205 feet of clearance for the massive container ships passing under the bridge; andWHEREAS, This new bridge should carry a name that reflects the role the bridge plays in economically connecting the City of Long Beach and the United States to the rest of the world through the Port of Long Beach; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature hereby designates the portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach, from post mile R3.773 to post mile R5.452R, covering the full length of State Bridge number 53-3000, as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge; and be it furtherResolved, That the Department of Transportation is requested to determine the cost of erecting appropriate signs, consistent with the signing requirements for the state highway system, showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Director of Transportation and to the author for appropriate distribution.
22
3- Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 148 CHAPTER 159Relative to the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. [ Filed with Secretary of State August 30, 2022. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 148, ODonnell. Long Beach International Gateway Bridge.This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost for appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs. Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES
3+ Enrolled August 25, 2022 Passed IN Senate August 23, 2022 Passed IN Assembly April 28, 2022 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 148Introduced by Assembly Member ODonnell(Principal coauthor: Senator Gonzalez)(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bennett, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Mia Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Choi, Cooper, Cunningham, Megan Dahle, Daly, Davies, Flora, Fong, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Nazarian, Nguyen, Patterson, Petrie-Norris, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Seyarto, Smith, Stone, Ting, Valladares, Villapudua, Voepel, Waldron, Ward, Akilah Weber, Wicks, Wilson, and Wood)February 18, 2022Relative to the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTACR 148, ODonnell. Long Beach International Gateway Bridge.This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost for appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs. Digest Key Fiscal Committee: YES
44
5- Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 148 CHAPTER 159
5+ Enrolled August 25, 2022 Passed IN Senate August 23, 2022 Passed IN Assembly April 28, 2022
66
7- Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 148
7+Enrolled August 25, 2022
8+Passed IN Senate August 23, 2022
9+Passed IN Assembly April 28, 2022
810
9- CHAPTER 159
11+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20212022 REGULAR SESSION
12+
13+ Assembly Concurrent Resolution
14+
15+No. 148
16+
17+Introduced by Assembly Member ODonnell(Principal coauthor: Senator Gonzalez)(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bennett, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Mia Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Choi, Cooper, Cunningham, Megan Dahle, Daly, Davies, Flora, Fong, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Nazarian, Nguyen, Patterson, Petrie-Norris, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Seyarto, Smith, Stone, Ting, Valladares, Villapudua, Voepel, Waldron, Ward, Akilah Weber, Wicks, Wilson, and Wood)February 18, 2022
18+
19+Introduced by Assembly Member ODonnell(Principal coauthor: Senator Gonzalez)(Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bennett, Berman, Bigelow, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Mia Bonta, Bryan, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Choi, Cooper, Cunningham, Megan Dahle, Daly, Davies, Flora, Fong, Mike Fong, Friedman, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kiley, Lackey, Levine, Low, Maienschein, Mathis, Mayes, McCarty, Medina, Nazarian, Nguyen, Patterson, Petrie-Norris, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Salas, Santiago, Seyarto, Smith, Stone, Ting, Valladares, Villapudua, Voepel, Waldron, Ward, Akilah Weber, Wicks, Wilson, and Wood)
20+February 18, 2022
1021
1122 Relative to the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge.
12-
13- [ Filed with Secretary of State August 30, 2022. ]
1423
1524 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
1625
1726 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
1827
1928 ACR 148, ODonnell. Long Beach International Gateway Bridge.
2029
2130 This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost for appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs.
2231
2332 This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost for appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs.
2433
2534 ## Digest Key
2635
2736 ## Bill Text
2837
2938 WHEREAS, The City of Long Beach is the seventh most populous city in California and serves as a major cultural and economic center in the Gateway Cities region; and
3039
3140 WHEREAS, The City of Long Beach is home to the Port of Long Beach, the second largest container port in the United States, moving 8,100,000 containers worth of cargo in 2020; and
3241
3342 WHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach serves as a local, regional, and statewide economic engine with a direct and statewide economic impact of $28.9 billion to Californias gross domestic product in 2017; and
3443
3544 WHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach supports 2,600,000 jobs throughout the United States that are dependent on trade traveling through the port, as well as directly supporting 576,000 jobs in the five-county southern California region alone; and
3645
3746 WHEREAS, The Port of Long Beach was connected to the nations highway system through the Gerald Desmond Bridge that saw 15 percent of all containerized cargo imported into the United States cross its length during the peak of its use; and
3847
3948 WHEREAS, The Gerald Desmond Bridge was not designed to accommodate this level of traffic going over it, or modern container ships passing under it, with the bridges maximum vertical clearance of only 155 feet; and
4049
4150 WHEREAS, To better serve this significant amount of economic traffic, the Port of Long Beach has partnered with the Department of Transportation, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and the United States Department of Transportation to initiate the Gerald Desmond Bridge Replacement Project (project); and
4251
4352 WHEREAS, The project has led to the construction of a new bridge to better accommodate the passage of the 68,000 vehicles expected to cross it every day; and
4453
4554 WHEREAS, This replacement bridge also provides up to 205 feet of clearance for the massive container ships passing under the bridge; and
4655
4756 WHEREAS, This new bridge should carry a name that reflects the role the bridge plays in economically connecting the City of Long Beach and the United States to the rest of the world through the Port of Long Beach; now, therefore, be it
4857
4958 Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate thereof concurring, That the Legislature hereby designates the portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach, from post mile R3.773 to post mile R5.452R, covering the full length of State Bridge number 53-3000, as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge; and be it further
5059
5160 Resolved, That the Department of Transportation is requested to determine the cost of erecting appropriate signs, consistent with the signing requirements for the state highway system, showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs; and be it further
5261
5362 Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the Director of Transportation and to the author for appropriate distribution.