California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1176

Introduced
2/17/22  
Introduced
2/17/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Refer
3/2/22  
Refer
3/30/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Refer
4/20/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Report Pass
4/27/22  
Refer
4/27/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  

Caption

Department of Financial Protection and Innovation: loan-related activities: data analysis and practices.

Impact

This legislation is expected to influence state laws related to financial transparency and community lending standards. It mandates the department to not only gauge how financial institutions serve different demographic groups based on income and race but also to provide public reports on these findings. Furthermore, the bill encourages the pursuit of best practices from other states that have enacted similar laws, likely leading to increased scrutiny and improved lending practices across California's financial landscape. By making such data publicly accessible, the bill supports greater transparency in a sector that often lacks accountability.

Summary

SB1176, introduced by Senator Limn, aims to enhance the accountability of financial institutions in California, particularly focusing on their lending practices toward underserved communities. Specifically, the bill tasks the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation with conducting peer group analyses of mortgage-related activities among licensed financial institutions. The aim is to assess how well various lenders, including both depository and nonbank institutions, are meeting the credit needs of diverse communities, particularly those that have historically experienced discrimination in lending practices. By analyzing publicly available data, the bill seeks to ensure that all citizens have equitable access to financial resources.

Sentiment

The reception of SB1176 portrays a positive sentiment among advocates for social equity in lending, who see it as a significant step toward bridging disparities in access to credit. Supporters argue that better data on lending practices will empower communities and promote policies that enhance financial inclusivity. Conversely, there is some concern among certain financial institutions regarding the potential increased regulatory burden and scrutiny this analysis may impose, which could lead to pushback from lobbyists representing these entities.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance between regulatory oversight and operational efficiency for financial institutions. As the bill encourages comprehensive data analysis using multivariate regression techniques to control for various borrower characteristics, it raises questions about the feasibility and actual impact of such rigorous scrutiny. Critics may argue that the increased data requirements could be burdensome for smaller lenders, potentially impacting their ability to operate effectively. The potential for differing interpretations of 'adequate' lending to underserved communities could also lead to disputes over compliance and regulatory standards in the future.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB801

Financial institutions: California Community Reinvestment Act.

CA SB193

Economic development: grant programs and other financial assistance.

CA AB193

Economic development: grant programs and other financial assistance.

CA AB912

Strategic Anti-Violence Funding Efforts Act.

CA SB151

Economic development.

IA SSB3074

A bill for an act creating a grocer reinvestment fund and program under the purview of the economic development authority, and making appropriations.

CA AB151

State employment: State Bargaining units: agreements: compensation and benefits.

CA AB1454

Trauma-informed diversion programs for youth.