Planning and zoning: housing development: higher education institutions and religious institutions.
The implications of SB 1336 on state laws are significant, as it alters the traditional landscape of local zoning and planning authority. Local governments would be required to approve housing developments if they fail to provide timely documentation of conflicts with objective planning standards. This represents a shift towards more state control in housing policy, aiming to promote greater density and affordable housing options in areas near educational and religious institutions. The bill explicitly states that it applies to all cities, overriding local zoning laws that may otherwise impede these developments.
Senate Bill 1336 aims to facilitate housing development on land owned by independent institutions of higher education and religious institutions in California. The bill allows such institutions to partner with qualified developers to apply for housing projects as a 'use by right', meaning that these projects could be approved without needing to go through the typical conditional use permitting process, provided they meet specified criteria. This is intended to expedite the development of housing, particularly affordable units, and help address the state’s ongoing housing crisis.
The sentiment surrounding SB 1336 is mixed, reflecting both support and opposition. Proponents argue that the bill is a much-needed step to combat the housing shortage in California, particularly for lower-income households. They see the streamlined approval process as a way to allocate resources effectively and rapidly construct much-needed housing. Conversely, opponents are concerned that this legislation may limit local governance and input, potentially leading to developments that do not align with community needs or planning standards.
Notable points of contention regarding SB 1336 include concerns about the adequacy of affordable housing commitments, as the bill allows for some units to be offered at moderate income levels rather than solely lower income. Additionally, the lack of reimbursement for local agencies tasked with processing these developments has raised concerns about fiscal burdens on local governments. The debate reflects broader discussions within California about the balance between state interests in housing development and local control over zoning and land use.