California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1383

Introduced
2/18/22  
Introduced
2/18/22  
Refer
3/9/22  
Refer
3/9/22  
Refer
3/16/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Refer
3/23/22  
Report Pass
4/21/22  
Report Pass
4/21/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Refer
4/25/22  
Report Pass
5/19/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Engrossed
5/25/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Refer
6/2/22  
Report Pass
6/23/22  
Refer
6/23/22  
Refer
6/23/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Report Pass
8/11/22  
Enrolled
8/25/22  
Enrolled
8/25/22  
Chaptered
9/28/22  
Passed
9/28/22  

Caption

Electricity: storage facilities: standards and records.

Impact

With SB 1383’s enactment, California aims to increase the transparency and reliability of its electricity storage systems, which play a critical role in integrating renewable energy sources. By requiring storage facilities to maintain specific operational standards and report on outages, the state hopes to improve grid stability and outage management, ensuring that electricity supply meets demand more effectively. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that regulations would not apply to certain federally regulated nuclear facilities or local utilities, which can impact how the law is implemented across various sectors within the electricity market.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 1383, introduced by Senator Hueso, amends Section 761.3 of the California Public Utilities Code to establish regulations for the maintenance and operation of electricity storage facilities. This bill mandates that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) form and enforce standards similar to those already in place for electricity generation facilities, thereby enhancing the oversight of storage operations. The law emphasizes the importance of consistent reporting of outages and operational statuses to the Independent System Operator (ISO), which is responsible for ensuring the reliability and efficiency of California's electrical transmission grid.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1383 appears to be generally positive among legislators and stakeholders in the renewable energy and utilities sector. Supporters believe that the bill represents a necessary step towards enhancing the regulatory framework governing energy storage, particularly as California transitions to a more renewable-powered grid. However, there are concerns regarding the potential burden this may place on smaller operators and the immediate impact it could have on their operations. This duality of support and concern reflects the complexities of advancing renewable energy initiatives while managing regulatory constraints.

Contention

A notable point of contention relates to the bill's implications for local utilities and the additional administrative responsibilities it imposes. Critics argue that the requirement for extensive reporting and compliance with new standards may disproportionately affect smaller storage operators or those with limited resources. Furthermore, the bill's classification of certain facilities as exempt raises questions concerning equity and the universality of regulations applied to all energy providers in California. As such, discussions around SB 1383 highlight an ongoing debate about striking the right balance between regulation, innovation, and maintaining energy equity in the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB38

Battery energy storage facilities: emergency response and emergency action plans.

CA SB283

Energy storage systems.

CA SB772

Long duration bulk energy storage: procurement.

CA AB3107

State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission: microgrids: study.

CA AB813

Multistate regional transmission system organization: membership.

CA SB1339

Electricity: microgrids: tariffs.

CA AB1513

Energy.

CA AB2787

Long duration bulk energy storage: procurement.