California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB220

Introduced
1/13/21  
Introduced
1/13/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
4/20/21  
Refer
4/20/21  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

Craft distillers: direct shipping.

Impact

The implications of SB 220 are significant for both local economies and the regulatory landscape. By facilitating direct sales to consumers, it empowers craft distillers to reach their customers without the middleman, potentially enhancing their revenue. Moreover, the bill establishes a new Type 89 license specifically for direct shipping, which requires a $100 application fee and a $25 annual renewal fee. However, the bill states that no state reimbursement will be required for the local agencies if the costs incurred are only related to the enforcement of new violations, thereby reducing potential financial burdens on local governments.

Summary

Senate Bill 220, introduced by Senator Skinner, seeks to amend existing laws related to the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages in California, specifically regarding craft distillers. This bill allows licensed craft distillers to sell and ship distilled spirits directly to California residents aged 21 and older for personal use, expanding the market opportunities for small distillers who may have been previously limited. It also introduces a new permitting process where out-of-state craft distillers can obtain a distilled spirits direct shipper permit to ship their products directly into California under similar conditions.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB 220 appears to be mixed but leaning towards a positive outlook among supporters who argue it is a progressive move towards modernizing alcohol distribution laws in California. Advocates for craft distillers emphasize that it gives them fairer market access, aiding small businesses in competition with larger corporate entities. However, opponents express concerns regarding the potential risks of more alcohol easily reaching consumers and the implications for public health and local businesses that may not have the capacity to also engage in such shipping.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the enforcement aspects of SB 220. Some legislators and stakeholders worry about the coordination and consequences of direct shipping, fearing that an influx of shipped spirits could challenge community standards and local policy agreements. Additionally, crafting safe shipping protocols to ensure that alcohol is not made available to minors and managing the subsequent taxation on sales are also points of concern, emphasizing the need for thorough regulation and oversight in the implementation of this law.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1088

Licensed craft distillers: direct shipping.

CA SB495

Alcoholic beverages: deliveries: off-sale retail licenses and consumer delivery service permits.

CA SB19

Winegrowers: tasting rooms.

CA AB2174

Alcoholic beverages: beer caterer’s permit.

CA SB846

Diablo Canyon powerplant: extension of operations.

CA AB631

Alcoholic beverage control: licenses: nonprofit cultural film exhibition companies.

CA SB1370

Alcoholic beverages: licensees.

CA SB793

Alcoholic beverages: music venue licenses.