California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB227

Introduced
1/15/21  
Introduced
1/15/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
1/28/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
4/5/21  
Refer
4/5/21  
Report Pass
4/13/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Refer
4/19/21  
Refer
4/19/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Report Pass
4/27/21  
Refer
4/27/21  
Report Pass
5/24/21  
Report Pass
5/24/21  
Engrossed
6/2/21  
Engrossed
6/2/21  
Refer
6/10/21  
Refer
6/10/21  
Report Pass
6/22/21  
Report Pass
6/22/21  
Refer
6/23/21  
Refer
7/5/21  

Caption

Off-highway vehicles.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts how off-highway vehicles are registered and operated in California. By enforcing identification requirements for competition vehicles, the legislation aims to enhance compliance with safety and environmental standards. Additionally, it introduces new fees for the issuance or renewal of identification plates, rising from $7 to a special fee of $42 for vehicles model year 2022 and newer. These fees will be channeled into the Off-Highway Vehicle Trust Fund, designed to support the costs associated with managing and maintaining off-highway recreation activities. This helps ensure that funds are available for the upkeep of areas where these activities take place.

Summary

Senate Bill 227, introduced by Senator Jones, addresses the regulation of off-highway vehicles in California. Effective January 1, 2023, the bill mandates that all competition all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorcycles used solely for competitive events must display identification issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). This requirement aims to standardize vehicle identification and usage regulations for off-highway vehicles, which previously included exemptions for certain vehicles operated in closed racing courses. The bill outlines specific identification requirements and imposes restrictions on the operation of these vehicles on public lands, emphasizing adherence to safety protocols when the vehicles are used in sanctioned competitions.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 227 appears mixed. Advocates argue that the bill promotes safety and accountability in off-highway vehicle usage while safeguarding public lands. They highlight that requiring identification can help manage environmental impacts and ensure that users adhere to safety standards. Conversely, critics express concerns about the added costs and regulatory burden this bill imposes on competition riders and emphasize the potential stifling effect on local racing events, particularly for community-sanctioned activities that might not have resources to adapt to the new requirements.

Contention

A notable point of contention in discussions surrounding SB 227 is the balance between regulating vehicle usage on public lands and maintaining accessibility for competition riding, particularly among local enthusiasts who may find the new requirements financially and logistically challenging. Some members of the community argue that the identification requirements and fees could deter new participants from engaging in off-highway recreation or could lead to inequities in how regulations affect different community groups. This highlights a broader debate about local autonomy versus state control in the management of recreational activities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB894

Off-highway vehicles.

CA SB1024

Off-highway vehicles.

CA SB586

Off-highway motor vehicles: eMotos.

CA AB232

Off-highway vehicles: reciprocity.

CA AB2761

Off-highway vehicles: reciprocity.

CA AB2956

Transportation.