California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB365

Introduced
2/10/21  
Refer
2/17/21  
Refer
2/17/21  
Refer
3/16/21  
Refer
3/16/21  
Report Pass
3/24/21  
Refer
3/24/21  
Refer
3/24/21  
Refer
5/4/21  
Refer
5/4/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
5/28/21  
Engrossed
5/28/21  
Refer
6/3/21  
Report Pass
7/7/21  
Refer
7/7/21  
Refer
7/7/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Enrolled
9/1/21  
Enrolled
9/1/21  

Caption

E-consult service.

Impact

The implementation of SB 365 will directly affect Medi-Cal's reimbursement policies, allowing enrolled providers to receive financial support for e-consult services. This adjustment is expected to alleviate barriers to care that currently exist due to the in-person requirements for traditional visits. By expanding the scope of telehealth, the bill seeks to improve overall healthcare accessibility for Medi-Cal beneficiaries and uninsured communities alike. This move is poised to benefit both patients and healthcare providers by reducing wait times for specialty care, enhancing treatment management, and streamlining the referral process.

Summary

Senate Bill 365, introduced by Senator Caballero, aims to amend the Welfare and Institutions Code to include electronic consultation services (e-consults) under the Medi-Cal program. The bill is designed to enhance access to healthcare for low-income individuals by allowing for reimbursement of e-consult services provided by federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs). This legislative change recognizes the growing importance of telehealth in offering patient-centered care, particularly in the context of the ongoing healthcare challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 365 tends to be largely positive among healthcare advocates and providers, who view the inclusion of e-consults as a necessary step towards modernizing healthcare delivery in California. Supporters assert that the expansion of telehealth services will not only support better patient outcomes through timely consultations but also enable a more efficient use of healthcare resources. However, there may still remain some skepticism regarding the ease of implementation and the potential need for further federal approvals, which could delay the operationalization of these provisions.

Contention

A notable contention involves the bill's dependence on federal waivers and approvals necessary for the reimbursement of e-consult services. Critics may voice concerns regarding the feasibility of these federal actions, especially in light of varying state and federal policies regarding telehealth. Furthermore, while the expansion of telehealth services is welcomed, there may be apprehensions about the adequacy of resources and the potential for disparities in access to technology that could limit equitable benefit across all communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB32

Telehealth.

CA AB457

Protection of Patient Choice in Telehealth Provider Act.

CA AB1494

Medi-Cal: telehealth: state of emergency.

CA AB2164

Telehealth.

CA SB1023

Reproductive health care coverage.