California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB460

Introduced
2/16/21  
Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
2/25/21  
Refer
3/16/21  
Refer
3/16/21  
Report Pass
3/24/21  
Report Pass
3/24/21  
Refer
3/24/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Report Pass
4/14/21  
Refer
4/14/21  
Refer
4/14/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Failed
2/1/22  

Caption

Long-term health facilities: patient representatives.

Impact

The bill mandates that nursing facilities conduct interdisciplinary team reviews for any medical intervention requiring consent if the resident lacks capacity and no surrogate decision-maker is available. This review process is intended to ensure that residents' healthcare needs and personal preferences are adequately represented and considered. Furthermore, patient representatives will play a critical role in articulating residents' wishes and protecting their rights during these reviews, thus ensuring that their voices are heard in healthcare decision-making processes.

Summary

Senate Bill 460, introduced by Senator Pan, aims to enhance the protection of nursing home residents' rights in California by establishing the Office of the Patient Representative within the California Department of Aging. This office is tasked with training, certifying, and overseeing patient representatives who will advocate for residents, particularly those who lack capacity to make healthcare decisions. The bill outlines the responsibilities of both patient representatives and healthcare facilities in ensuring that residents receive appropriate support when facing medical interventions that require informed consent.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 460 appears largely favorable among advocacy groups focused on elder rights and healthcare reform. Supporters applaud the measure as a means to enhance resident protection and accountability within nursing facilities. However, concerns have been raised regarding the capacity of facilities to implement these protocols effectively and the potential burden on resources. Overall, there is a general agreement on the necessity of safeguards for vulnerable populations within long-term care settings.

Contention

Concerns surrounding SB 460 focus on the practical implications of its implementation, particularly regarding the adequacy of funding and support for the Office of the Patient Representative. Critics may argue that without sufficient resources, the office may struggle to fulfill its mandate effectively. Additionally, specifications regarding the independence of patient representatives—who cannot be employees or former employees of the facility—raise questions about staffing and the availability of qualified representatives in every facility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB481

Successor agencies: assets: disposal.

CA AB135

Human services omnibus.

CA SB135

State employment: State Bargaining units: agreements: compensation and benefits.

MO SB419

Modifies MO HealthNet coverage of hearing instruments

MO SB748

Modifies provisions relating to reimbursement allowance taxes

MO SB317

Modifies provisions relating to health care

MO SB1443

Modifies MO HealthNet coverage of hearing instruments

MO SB828

Enacts provisions relating to medical testing