California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SCR92

Introduced
3/30/22  
Introduced
3/30/22  
Refer
3/30/22  
Refer
3/30/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/6/22  
Refer
4/28/22  
Engrossed
6/23/22  
Engrossed
6/23/22  
Refer
6/30/22  
Refer
8/4/22  
Refer
8/4/22  
Enrolled
8/23/22  
Enrolled
8/23/22  
Chaptered
8/30/22  
Chaptered
8/30/22  
Passed
8/30/22  

Caption

The Equal Rights Amendment: the California Law Revision Commission: study.

Impact

If enacted, SCR92 would potentially lead to significant revisions in California statutes and common law, promoting the eradication of language that discriminates on the basis of sex and ensuring that enforcement of laws is applied equitably. The report generated by the Commission could result in new legislative proposals that aim at compliance with the ERA, further advancing women's rights and preventing sex-based discrimination in various sectors, including employment, education, and public life.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 92 (SCR92) seeks to address gender discrimination in California law by mandating a comprehensive study by the California Law Revision Commission. The study aims to identify deficiencies in California legislation that either contains discriminatory language based on sex or has disparate impacts on enforcement of laws based on gender. The resolution is rooted in the context of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) and reflects California's ongoing commitment to gender equality in legal frameworks.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR92 is generally positive, with strong support from various advocacy groups and legislators committed to gender equality. Proponents argue that this measure is a crucial step towards eliminating outdated and discriminatory laws. However, there may be some contention regarding the resources required for such a study and potential pushback from those who believe existing laws sufficiently protect against discrimination.

Contention

While there is widespread agreement on the need to consider gender equity in law, the debate may arise around defining what constitutes discriminatory language and how to evaluate impacts effectively. The challenge lies in addressing various interpretations of gender equality and ensuring that any proposed changes are inclusive and comprehensive. The Commission's findings could also spark further discussions on related issues, such as intersectionality and the implications of various law enforcement practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACR28

Sickle Cell Disease Awareness Month.

CA SR111

Relative to California Life Sciences Month.

CA ACR225

Coastal Stewardship Day.

CA ACR91

California Hindu American Awareness and Appreciation Month.

CA SCR38

Capital punishment.

CA SCR52

Every Kid Healthy Week.

CA SCR29

Postsecondary education: University of California: University Council-American Federation of Teachers.

CA ACR216

California Hindu American Awareness and Appreciation Month.