California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1318

Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/18/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Report Pass
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Refer
4/27/23  
Report Pass
5/10/23  
Report Pass
5/10/23  
Engrossed
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/18/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Refer
5/31/23  

Caption

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: residential projects.

Impact

The implications of AB 1318 are significant, as it expands the type of residential projects that can bypass extensive environmental reviews, which are typically required under CEQA to assess potential environmental impacts. By increasing the area threshold, the bill is designed to promote urban infill development, which is considered vital for sustainable growth and managing urban sprawl. Proponents argue that this will facilitate faster construction timelines for residential housing projects, helping to alleviate the housing crisis in California. However, this shift may also raise concerns regarding environmental protections and adequate oversight in areas potentially sensitive to urban development.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1318, introduced by Assembly Member Luz Rivas, seeks to amend the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by increasing the size of qualifying residential projects for exemption from CEQA's environmental review process from a maximum of 4 acres to 5 acres. This amendment aims to simplify the approval process for residential projects located on urbanized infill sites, thereby potentially accelerating housing development in areas currently facing housing shortages and high demand. The bill mandates that any lead agency approving such an exempt project must file a notice of exemption with the Office of Planning and Research, ensuring state-level oversight of local approvals.

Contention

Critics of AB 1318 may view the proposal as a weakening of environmental safeguards, suggesting that broad exemptions could lead to insufficient scrutiny of projects that might still pose environmental risks. Concerns also arise regarding how this change will affect local governments' autonomy when it comes to enforcing their own development standards. The bill's provision that no reimbursement is required for local agencies and school districts reinforces the expectation that local jurisdictions will absorb any additional responsibilities incurred by the filing of exemption notices, which may elicit mixed reactions among local officials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB854

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions.

CA SB445

California Environmental Quality Act: infill development.

CA AB499

California Environmental Quality Act: infill development.

CA AB2323

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions.

CA SB73

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions.

CA AB1824

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption for closure of railroad grade crossing.

CA SB1274

Environmental quality: environmental leadership development projects: clean energy transmission projects: offshore wind.

CA AB2199

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: residential or mixed-use housing projects.