California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1696

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Refer
3/9/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Report Pass
3/22/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Engrossed
5/4/23  
Engrossed
5/4/23  
Refer
5/4/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Enrolled
6/29/23  
Vetoed
7/21/23  

Caption

Sober Living Accountability Act.

Impact

The implementation of AB 1696 is expected to enhance accountability and oversight of recovery residences. By requiring documentation and ethical compliance, the bill aims to protect residents from inadequate care and to ensure that these facilities promote safe recovery environments. This legislative effort aligns with ongoing initiatives to improve substance abuse treatment and recovery services across the state, reflecting a recognition of the complexities involved in rehabilitation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1696, also known as the Sober Living Accountability Act, aims to impose stricter regulations on privately owned recovery residences in California. The bill mandates that any government entity entering into contracts with these facilities must require specific documentation. This includes written permission from property owners to operate on their land, adherence to ethical guidelines aligned with the National Alliance for Recovery Residences, and clear policies regarding residents' access to medications, including naloxone. The bill is set to take effect for contracts entered into or amended from January 1, 2024 onward.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1696 has generally been positive among supporters who argue that the bill is a necessary step toward improving the standards of care in the recovery sector. Advocates believe that by imposing these requirements, the bill will help prevent exploitative practices and ensure that residents are treated with dignity. However, some critics express concerns about the potential burden this may place on smaller recovery residences, fearing that the added requirements could hinder their operations.

Contention

Debate around AB 1696 has highlighted ongoing tensions between the need for regulation and the desire for accessible recovery services. Opponents worry that increased regulatory oversight might deter recovery residences from operating or lead to increased costs that could be passed on to residents. These discussions reveal a broader conversation on how best to support individuals in recovery while ensuring their rights and safety are upheld.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2214

Recovery residences.

CA AB285

Drug and alcohol free residences.

CO HB1204

Recovery Residence Discharge Policy

CA AB1158

Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities: recovery residences: insurance coverage.

CA AB940

Recovery residences.

CA AB1037

Public health: substance use disorder.