California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1758

Introduced
3/2/23  
Introduced
3/2/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Refer
5/10/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
6/1/23  
Engrossed
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Refer
8/21/23  

Caption

Court records: fees.

Impact

Legally, AB1758 modifies existing protocols surrounding court records under the California Government Code by introducing requirements for electronic public access. This changes the landscape of public information as it obligates courts to enhance their technological capabilities for remote access, thus aligning with modern digital standards and the expectations of a tech-savvy society. The bill also intends to streamline the process for accessing essential civil case records, significantly impacting individuals and entities who rely on such data for various legal and civil engagements.

Summary

AB1758 is focused on enhancing the public's access to court records by ensuring that these records, maintained in electronic format, are available for inspection and copying during courthouse hours. The bill mandates that by January 1, 2025, courts must provide remote access to public court records related to civil cases, including registers of actions, calendars, and indexes. This move is aimed at facilitating transparency and improving accessibility to judicial records for the public, a key component of democratic governance.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB1758 is one of support among advocates for transparency and open government, who view the bill as a progressive step towards modernizing the judicial system. However, there are concerns from some quarters regarding the feasibility of implementing remote access, particularly for less resourced courts that may struggle with the technological demands. Additionally, while proponents advocate for free access to records, others warn that the commercial fee structure might hinder equal access, especially for low-income individuals seeking legal information.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the proposed fee structure for commercial users, which allows courts to charge fees to entities accessing large volumes of records for commercial purposes. This is seen by some as an essential compromise to sustain the costs of digital infrastructure while others argue it could create barriers to access for legal service organizations and disadvantaged individuals. The legislation also stipulates that by January 1, 2026, the Judicial Council must develop guidelines for commercial user fees, indicating ongoing deliberations around the balance between access and sustainability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2962

Court records: fees.

CA AB947

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: sensitive personal information.

CA AB1008

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: personal information.

CA SB1223

Consumer privacy: sensitive personal information: neural data.

CA AB694

Privacy and Consumer Protection: omnibus bill.

CA AB103

Public safety: omnibus.

CA AB873

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.

CA AB1355

Personal information.