California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1765

Introduced
3/16/23  
Introduced
3/16/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Refer
4/18/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Report Pass
4/25/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
6/1/23  
Engrossed
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Refer
7/13/23  
Report Pass
8/14/23  
Report Pass
8/14/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Enrolled
9/7/23  
Enrolled
9/7/23  
Chaptered
9/22/23  
Chaptered
9/22/23  

Caption

Income tax administration: installment agreements, suspension, forfeiture, and revivor.

Impact

The most notable impact of AB 1765 is the raising of the cap on individual taxpayer liabilities eligible for installment agreements from $10,000 to $25,000, alongside extending the maximum repayment period from 3 years to 5 years. This legislative move is anticipated to significantly ease financial pressures on individual taxpayers facing hardships, encouraging compliance and potentially increasing overall state revenue by making tax liabilities more manageable. The bill also revises review processes for installment agreements, which could improve oversight and enforcement.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1765 aims to amend sections of the Revenue and Taxation Code relating to the administration of income taxes, specifically addressing installment payment agreements for taxpayers experiencing financial hardship. The bill expands the Franchise Tax Board's authority to allow taxpayers to enter installment agreements that encompass all tax liabilities rather than just specific types. This change aims to facilitate easier tax compliance and provide flexibility for those struggling with tax payments, which has been a concern in past legislative sessions.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around AB 1765 seems to be positive, particularly from advocates for taxpayer relief and financial assistance. Supporters assert that it provides a necessary lifeline for constituents who may otherwise fall into arrears with their taxes. However, there may be some contention about whether the bill does enough to protect the interests of both taxpayers and the state's revenue collection efforts. The balance between aiding struggling taxpayers and ensuring adequate revenue flow remains a nuanced debate among legislators.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve concerns regarding the potential for abuse of the expanded repayment terms — particularly whether certain taxpayers may take advantage of the more lenient compliance rules. Additionally, the bill requires that the Franchise Tax Board review a representative sample of existing installment agreements every two years, which indicates a level of oversight; however, opponents may argue whether this is sufficient to maintain fiscal responsibility. The bill's provisions concerning corporate taxpayers are also a subject of scrutiny, especially regarding how the adjustments might affect business operations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB516

Health care coverage: prior authorization.

CA AB420

Public utilities: property, franchises, and permits: exemption.

CA SB1410

COVID-19 emergency: tenancies.

CA AB2150

Corporate securities: limited exemption: study.

CA AB3362

State Bar: open meetings: discipline: attorneys: foreign legal consultants: annual license fees.

CA AB1582

Income taxes: withholding: real property sales: Katz-Harris Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights Act: report.

CA AB473

Motor vehicle manufacturers, distributors, and dealers.

CA AB2107

New Motor Vehicle Board.