Local educational agencies: housing development projects: lower income households.
The implementation of AB 1835 is expected to facilitate the construction of affordable housing for public employees and community members. It specifically targets housing projects that consist of at least ten units and sets forth requirements that ensure 30% of these units are affordable to lower income households. The legislation also establishes that local agencies must first offer these units to local educational agency employees, thereby aiming to improve housing accessibility for those who serve the community. This could significantly reduce barriers to housing for educational personnel and public employees.
Assembly Bill 1835 aims to support affordable housing projects on properties owned by local educational agencies in California. By amending Section 65914.7 of the Government Code, this bill allows housing developments that meet specific criteria to be classified as allowable uses without requiring extensive local government review or approval, which is typically mandated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The bill emphasizes the importance of maintaining affordability for at least 55 years, particularly ensuring that the majority of units are affordable to lower income households.
The sentiment surrounding AB 1835 appears to be largely supportive among proponents who see it as a necessary measure to alleviate the housing crisis, especially in relation to educators and public service workers. Critics may express concerns about the implications for local control and the ability of communities to influence housing developments in their areas. Overall, the discussion points towards a consensus on the urgency of addressing affordable housing yet highlights the complexities of balancing state guidelines with local governance.
Notably, AB 1835 does not require reimbursement to local agencies for costs incurred under the new mandate, which could lead to contention among local governments that may feel financially burdened. Moreover, the lack of discretionary review for housing developments on educational properties could raise concerns regarding the oversight and planning of local developments, potentially altering the dynamics of local zoning practices. The law’s temporary nature, expiring in 2033, also suggests that ongoing discussions will be critical to evaluate its long-term effectiveness and address any arising issues.