California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1943

Introduced
1/29/24  
Introduced
1/29/24  
Refer
2/20/24  
Refer
2/20/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Refer
4/8/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Report Pass
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/1/24  
Engrossed
5/9/24  
Refer
5/9/24  
Refer
5/9/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Report Pass
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/5/24  
Refer
6/6/24  
Refer
6/6/24  
Refer
6/17/24  

Caption

Medi-Cal: telehealth.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1943 will impact state laws by adding Section 14132.726 to the Welfare and Institutions Code, thereby formalizing state policy on telehealth. The bill requires the Department of Health Care Services to conduct in-depth analyses that include stratifying results by geographic and demographic factors. This will help identify disparities in telehealth access and effectiveness, informing future policy recommendations to optimize healthcare delivery for vulnerable populations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1943 seeks to enhance the use of telehealth services within the Medi-Cal program in California by mandating the production of a comprehensive public report by October 1, 2025. This report will assess various aspects of telehealth, including access, utilization, and its effects on the timeliness, quality of care, and overall clinical outcomes for Medi-Cal enrollees. It aims to particularly focus on medically underserved communities, thereby striving to improve healthcare accessibility and patient outcomes across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1943 appears largely positive, reflecting a shared desire to expand access to telehealth services and improve care quality for Medi-Cal recipients. Stakeholders, advocates, and healthcare professionals view the bill as a necessary step towards modernizing California’s approach to healthcare delivery, particularly in the wake of heightened reliance on virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are underlying concerns regarding the implementation of telehealth in practice and whether it will effectively meet the needs of all communities, especially those that are historically underserved.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily revolve around the feasibility and effectiveness of telehealth in reaching the most vulnerable populations. Critics may argue about potential gaps in service for individuals who lack internet access or technological literacy, raising questions about equity in healthcare delivery. Additionally, there may be concerns regarding the adequacy of the data collected and whether it truly represents the experiences of all Medi-Cal enrollees, especially those in rural areas or communities of color.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB688

Telehealth for All Act of 2025.

CA AB2164

Telehealth.

CA AB2007

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health center: rural health clinic: telehealth.

CA AB1275

Health information.

CA AB1369

Out-of-state physicians and surgeons: telehealth: license exemption.

CA AB1399

Veterinary medicine: veterinarian-client-patient relationship: telehealth.

CA AB257

Specialty care networks: telehealth and other virtual services.

CA AB2726

Specialty care networks: telehealth and other virtual services.