California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2290

Introduced
2/12/24  
Introduced
2/12/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Report Pass
4/9/24  
Refer
4/9/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Refer
5/15/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/23/24  
Engrossed
5/23/24  
Refer
5/24/24  
Refer
5/24/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/12/24  
Refer
6/13/24  
Refer
6/13/24  
Refer
6/24/24  

Caption

Transportation: Class III bikeways: bicycle facilities: Bikeway Quick-Build Project Pilot Program.

Impact

AB2290 is set to have significant implications on state transportation laws, particularly regarding funding allocations within the Active Transportation Program. By enforcing stricter requirements on where Class III bikeways can be constructed, the bill aims to prioritize pedestrian and cyclist safety. Furthermore, it encourages the integration of bikeways into existing transportation plans, thus fostering a more coherent and accessible network for non-motorized transport throughout the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2290, introduced by Assembly Member Friedman, focuses on enhancing California's bikeway infrastructure by regulating the funding and implementation of Class III bikeways through the Active Transportation Program. The bill stipulates strict guidelines for the establishment of such bikeways, ensuring that funding is only allocated to projects on roads with design speed limits of 20 miles per hour or lower, or that contribute to reducing these limits. This measure aims to promote safer and more accessible biking conditions across the state, aligning with goals to increase active modes of transportation like biking and walking.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB2290 appears to be supportive among advocacy groups and proponents of active transportation, who argue that creating safer cycling conditions will not only enhance community mobility but also promote health and environmental benefits. However, there might be concerns regarding the potential limitations on funding for certain projects, particularly in areas where speed limits exceed the stipulated guidelines, suggesting a divide in opinions on practicality versus safety in transportation planning.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions regarding the blanket restrictions on funding for Class III bikeways on higher speed limit roads and the deletion of considerations related to nearby alternative facilities. Some stakeholders argue that this could hinder the development of necessary bike infrastructure in urban areas where higher speed limits are common. Moreover, the effectiveness of the Bikeway Quick-Build Project Pilot Program, aimed at expediting the implementation of such projects, will need careful evaluation to ensure it meets its goals without compromising on safety standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1402

Active Transportation Program.

CA SB152

Active Transportation Program.

CA SB936

Department of Transportation: study: state highway system: road safety projects.

CA SB1227

Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program.

CA AB1035

Department of Transportation and local agencies: streets and highways: recycled materials.

CA AB1975

Local government: bus shelters.

CA AB115

Transportation.

CA SB99

Transportation.