Classified employees: school and community college districts: merit system: disciplinary action.
The implications of AB 2328 could be substantial for employment practices within California's educational institutions. By solidifying protections for classified employees against unjust disciplinary measures, the law aims to foster a more stable work environment. This change is particularly relevant given the complexities involved in employee retention and the potential for classifying incidents leading to disciplinary actions. Local school boards and community colleges will need to assess their current disciplinary procedures and adapt their policies in accordance with the new statute to avoid infringing on the rights of classified personnel.
Assembly Bill 2328, introduced by Assembly Member Mike Fong, seeks to amend the Education Code regarding classified employees in school and community college districts. The bill specifically modifies Sections 45302 and 88121 to offer greater protection against disciplinary actions taken against members of the permanent classified service. The existing law already prohibits demotions or removals of classified individuals except for reasonable causes as designated by the relevant commission. The new provisions will extend such protections to exclude causes arising prior to becoming a permanent member and those that occurred more than two years before any notice of cause is filed, underscoring a significant alteration in the timeline for potential disciplinary actions.
Notably, this bill would introduce a new crime related to the violation of these provisions. The proposed changes in AB 2328 could become a point of contention, as stakeholders may debate the balance between necessary disciplinary action and employee rights. Critics might argue that while protecting employees' rights is essential, the bill could complicate the process for schools to address legitimate issues of misconduct or inefficiency. Additionally, the lack of reimbursement required by the act raises questions about the potential financial burden it may place on local agencies and school districts as they adjust to the updated regulations.