California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2333

Introduced
2/12/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Refer
3/12/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Refer
3/20/24  
Report Pass
4/2/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/12/24  
Refer
6/13/24  

Caption

State highways: airspace leases: report.

Impact

With the introduction of AB 2333, the law surrounding the leasing of airspace associated with state highways will be more regulated. The bill mandates that comprehensive reports be submitted annually to both the Assembly and Senate Transportation Committees, starting from January 1, 2026. These reports will facilitate monitoring compliance with lease obligations and ensure that any issues concerning safety regulations or non-compliance are properly addressed. The revenues generated from these leases will also be directed into the State Highway Account, which reinforces fiscal accountability.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2333, introduced by Assembly Member Santiago, aims to amend Section 104.12 of the Streets and Highways Code regarding airspace leases related to state highways. The bill requires the Department of Transportation to provide detailed reports on every airspace site leased by them. These reports are intended to ensure transparency and accountability regarding the use of airspace above or below state highways, and the information reported will include data on site inspections and proximity to sensitive infrastructure. The implementation of this bill would enhance oversight of properties leased through public and private entities, potentially increasing safety measures for adjacent land uses.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding AB 2333 appears to be supportive among those advocating for increased oversight and accountability in government operations. Stakeholders recognize the importance of ensuring that the use of airspace above highways does not compromise safety and that it adheres to established regulations. Nonetheless, some concern may rise regarding the bureaucratic burden of compliance and reporting, particularly from entities that operate under these leases. Thus, while the sentiment leans positive towards improved governance, the logistics of implementation may face scrutiny.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding the bill is the potential impact on private entities wishing to lease airspace. The requirement for comprehensive inspections and compliance reporting could be seen as an additional administrative barrier for businesses seeking to utilize state highway airspace effectively. While the intentions behind AB 2333 focus on safety and infrastructure integrity, there is a possibility that the increased regulatory framework could deter investment opportunities or complicate negotiations for future leases, leading to pushback from business stakeholders concerned with operational feasibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1226

State highways: property leases: assessment.

CA SB211

State highways: leases.

VA HB2087

Electric utilities; transportation electrification, definitions.

CA SB985

Otay Mesa East Toll Facility Act.

CA SB415

High-speed rail: rights-of-way.

CA SB493

Air pollution: alternative vehicles and electric and hydrogen infrastructure.

LA HB598

Provides for changes to the highway priority program

VA SB1190

Solar photovoltaic projects; siting, decisions of localities, etc.