Connecticut Senate Bill SB00975

Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/13
• Refer: 2/26/13
• Report Pass: 3/15/13
• Refer: 3/28/13
• Report Pass: 4/4/13
• Refer: 4/24/13
• Report Pass: 5/1/13
• Report Pass: 5/3/13
• Refer: 5/8/13
• Report Pass: 5/14/13
• Refer: 5/21/13
• Report Pass: 5/23/13
• Engrossed: 6/1/13
• Report Pass: 6/1/13
• Chaptered: 6/20/13
• Enrolled: 6/26/13
• Passed: 7/1/13

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Transportation Statutes And The Designation Of Roads And Bridges In Honor Or In Memory Of Persons And Organizations.

Impact

This bill will have significant implications for state laws governing transportation and infrastructure management. By authorizing local memorial designations, the bill aims to foster a sense of community and honor local legacies, while the adjustments to property management reflect a necessary modernization of state regulations. The intended revisions could facilitate the more efficient use of state-owned land, as well as ensure that such transactions are performed in a transparent manner, benefiting both the state and the localities involved.

Summary

SB00975, known as An Act Concerning Revisions To The Transportation Statutes And The Designation Of Roads And Bridges In Honor Or In Memory Of Persons And Organizations, was introduced to make various updates and improvements to the existing transportation statutes. The bill includes provisions for the designation of specific roads and bridges in honor of individuals or organizations, thereby enhancing the recognition of their contributions to the community or state. Furthermore, the bill allows the Commissioner of Transportation to amend procedures governing the sale or transfer of state property deemed unnecessary for transportation purposes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB00975 appears to be positive, particularly among those advocating for local recognition and memorials. Supporters argue that designating roads and bridges not only honors individuals but also enriches local heritage and fosters community pride. However, opposition may arise from fiscal conservatives concerned about potential costs associated with maintaining additional signage and the implications of transferring state property. Nevertheless, the lack of significant dissent at the committee level or during voting suggests broad legislative support.

Contention

One point of contention is related to the procedures for managing state property. Critics may argue that the new provisions for disposals and transfers could lead to improper sales or influence local zoning regulations, potentially disadvantaging the communities around designated properties. While the bill intends to streamline these processes, there are concerns about transparency and accountability in how state lands are handled, as well as the impacts on local housing or business developments around released properties.