Connecticut Senate Bill SB00235

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/14
• Refer: 2/20/14
• Report Pass: 3/14/14
• Refer: 3/24/14
• Report Pass: 3/31/14
• Refer: 4/9/14
• Report Pass: 4/14/14
• Report Pass: 4/16/14
• Refer: 4/17/14
• Report Pass: 4/23/14
• Report Pass: 4/24/14
• Engrossed: 5/7/14
• Report Pass: 5/7/14
• Chaptered: 5/21/14
• Enrolled: 5/28/14
• Passed: 6/12/14

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Transportation Statutes.

Impact

The legislation proposes various amendments to the transportation statutes that grant the commissioner increased authority regarding funding, contracting, and the provision of transportation services. Specifically, it allows the state to form contracts with various entities to initiate or improve transportation services. Another critical aspect is the permission given to the commissioner to acquire properties and facilities necessary for transportation purposes, which can improve infrastructure and service availability across the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 235, also known as the Act Concerning Revisions to the Transportation Statutes, aims to enhance and streamline the management and operations of public transportation within the state. Notably, the bill introduces the concept of a 'fare inspector,' who will be responsible for ensuring compliance with fare payment for state-owned or controlled transportation services. This development is significant as it establishes a formal role within public transportation enforcement, addressing issues of fare evasion which can impact revenue.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 235 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who see this as a necessary update to handling transportation in modern contexts. Proponents argue that these changes will not only enhance service efficiency but can also help capture lost revenue from fare evasion. However, there are concerns from some community members regarding the potential implications of increased oversight and whether it might lead to an overemphasis on legislation that could prioritize enforcement over accessibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions around the bill include the balance between necessary enforcement of fare compliance and the accessibility of public transport services, particularly for low-income individuals. Questions about the effectiveness of fare inspectors and their authority to issue citations were prevalent, as critics worry this could disproportionately affect vulnerable populations rather than enhance service efficiency.