California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2586

Introduced
2/14/24  
Introduced
2/14/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Report Pass
4/10/24  
Refer
4/10/24  
Refer
4/10/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Refer
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Engrossed
5/22/24  
Refer
5/23/24  
Refer
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/10/24  
Refer
6/10/24  
Refer
6/10/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
7/3/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/26/24  
Enrolled
8/26/24  
Vetoed
9/22/24  

Caption

Public postsecondary education: student employment.

Impact

If passed, AB 2586 would significantly alter hiring practices at these public universities and colleges, allowing undocumented students to seek positions that they may have previously been barred from due to stringent federal proof requirements. In treating certain federal prohibitions on employment as inapplicable to state educational institutions, the bill fosters a more inclusive environment for all students, thereby potentially increasing student employment participation rates in academic roles within these universities. The bill necessitates implementation by January 6, 2025.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2586, introduced by Assembly Members Alvarez and Gipson, seeks to amend employment verification practices within California's public postsecondary education institutions, namely the University of California, California State University, and California Community Colleges. The bill aims to prohibit these institutions from disqualifying students from employment based solely on their inability to provide proof of federal work authorization, unless such proof is mandated by federal law or a condition of specific grants tied to the employment position. The goal is to create inclusive employment opportunities for all students regardless of their immigration status.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2586 appears to be favorable among proponents who advocate for educational equity and expanded opportunities for undocumented students. Advocates believe that the legislation would help dismantle barriers to employment that many students face, thus promoting a more equitable workforce. However, critics may raise concerns regarding adherence to federal immigration laws and the implications of bypassing work authorization requirements, suggesting a more polarized reaction among various stakeholders.

Contention

Debate over AB 2586 may center on the tension between state and federal responsibilities regarding immigration laws and work authorization. Proponents emphasize the importance of reducing barriers for students in higher education while critics might argue that such measures could undermine federal immigration policy. The bill also raises questions about the balancing act between inclusivity in educational environments and compliance with federal requirements, marking it as a significant point of discussion within the broader context of immigration reform in education.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB713

Public postsecondary education: student employment.

CA SB331

Suicide prevention: strategic plans.

CA SB257

School admissions: pupil residency: pupils of departed parents: residents of adjoining state or foreign country: school district reimbursement.

CA AB1557

Pharmacy: electronic prescriptions.

CA SB739

Elections: vote by mail ballots and false or misleading information.

CA SB276

Workweek: overtime: legislative employees.

CA AB944

CalWORKs: sponsored noncitizen: indigence exception.

CA AB311

California Food Assistance Program: eligibility and benefits.