California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2755

Introduced
2/15/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Engrossed
5/20/24  
Engrossed
5/20/24  
Refer
5/21/24  
Refer
5/21/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/10/24  
Report Pass
6/10/24  
Enrolled
6/17/24  
Enrolled
6/17/24  
Chaptered
7/15/24  
Chaptered
7/15/24  

Caption

Claims against the state: appropriation.

Impact

The bill has implications for state financial management and the Government Claims Act, as it directly affects how the state authorizes and allocates funds for legal settlements. By declaring this appropriation as an urgency statute, the bill is designed to allow for immediate action, highlighting the state's commitment to resolving these claims swiftly, thereby reducing hardship for claimants. This legislative move reflects an ongoing effort to maintain fiscal responsibility while meeting the state’s legal obligations.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2755, introduced by Assemblymember Wicks, addresses the necessity for the state of California to appropriate funds for the payment of certain legal claims, settlements, or judgments against the state. Specifically, the bill allocates a total of $523,000 from the General Fund to the Attorney General. This action is a response to obligations arising from three specific legal cases that have rendered judgments or settlements requiring state payment. The funding is designated to ensure that these payments can be expedited to settle claims without undue delay for the affected parties.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 2755 appears to be generally supportive, particularly from legislators and stakeholders who view timely financial responses to claims as essential to preserving trust in state governance and legal processes. The urgency clause in the bill signifies recognition of the immediate need for action, which may enhance its overall reception among lawmakers and the public.

Contention

However, the appropriation of $523,000 could evoke discussions regarding the potential for misuse of state funds and the prioritization of legal claims over other pressing state financial responsibilities. Critics may question the criteria for selecting which claims receive funding and argue for transparency in the process of settlement approvals. The legislative process surrounding this bill will likely reveal differing perspectives on resource allocation and the balance between legal accountability and fiscal stewardship.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB251

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA SB1481

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA AB6

Attorney General: duties.

CA SB939

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA SB383

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA SB418

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA SB1355

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA AB1773

Claims against the state.