California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB251

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Refer
4/1/25  

Caption

Claims against the state: appropriation.

Impact

The bill is positioned as an urgency statute, which means it will take effect immediately upon passage. This designation underscores the urgency of appropriating funds to alleviate the financial burdens placed on claimants due to the delayed payment of claims against the state. By facilitating timely payments, SB251 aims to uphold the state's responsibilities and commitments, promoting trust in the legal system while ensuring that justice is served without unnecessary delays.

Summary

Senate Bill 251, introduced by Senator Caballero, aims to address the payment of legal claims against the state of California by making a significant appropriation from the General Fund. The bill proposes to allocate a total of $1,221,491.30 to the Attorney General for the payment of specific claims, settlements, and judgments arising from legal actions, including notable cases such as First Amendment Coalition v. Bonta, Linton v. Bonta, and X Corp. v. Bonta. The appropriation is intended to ensure that the state can fulfill its legal obligations and prevent further legal complications or hardships for claimants awaiting payment.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB251 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers who recognize the need for the state to address its financial obligations promptly. The urgency of the bill reflects a consensus on the importance of ensuring that claimants are compensated without undue delay. However, discussions could also dive into broader concerns regarding recurring claims against the state and the necessity of long-term adjustments or reforms to avoid similar issues in the future.

Contention

While SB251 aims to facilitate urgent payments, it does bring to light questions regarding future funding for claims against the state and managing legal risks. The amounts appropriated are intended for specific past cases, which may lead to debates on whether similar situations might arise in the future, necessitating additional appropriations. Opponents could argue for more comprehensive measures that address systemic issues in how claims are managed and funded to prevent reliance on emergency appropriations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB832

State government.

CA SB261

Division of Labor Standards Enforcement: orders, decisions, and awards.

CA SB790

Postsecondary education: postsecondary education coordinating entity: interstate reciprocity agreements for distance education: out-of-state postsecondary educational institutions.

CA AB1033

Eminent domain: appraisals: compensation.

CA AB931

State Bar Act: consumer legal funding.

CA ABX11

Budget Act of 2024.

DC PR26-0021

Office of Employee Appeals Pia Winston Confirmation Resolution of 2025

CA SB29

Civil actions: decedent’s cause of action.