California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB535

Introduced
2/16/17  
Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Report Pass
4/17/17  
Engrossed
4/24/17  
Engrossed
4/24/17  
Refer
5/8/17  
Report Pass
5/17/17  
Enrolled
5/22/17  
Enrolled
5/22/17  
Chaptered
5/26/17  
Passed
5/26/17  

Caption

Claims against the state: appropriation.

Impact

This bill modifies existing state law regarding the appropriation process for claims against the state. Under current regulations, the Attorney General must report when funds are insufficient for settling certain claims, leading to legislative action for funding. SB 535 streamlines this process by directly allocating specific funds to address past judgments, thereby enhancing the state’s ability to fulfill its financial responsibilities without prolonged legislative delays. This could lead to more efficient handling of similar cases in the future.

Summary

Senate Bill 535, introduced by Senator Lara, addresses claims against the state by appropriating $32,022,611.07 from the General Fund to provide payment for specific judgments. The bill is intended to ensure that the state can meet its financial obligations related to legal settlements and judgments promptly, mitigating any hardships faced by claimants awaiting payment. Highlighting the necessity for immediate action, the bill classifies itself as an urgency statute, which allows it to take effect immediately upon passage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 535 appears positive overall, as it aims to promptly resolve outstanding legal obligations, which is generally viewed as a responsible approach to governance. Legislators expressed support for the bill, underlining its importance for ensuring that the state can effectively manage its judicial and financial responsibilities. However, an underlying concern might exist regarding the overall fiscal health of the state's budget and the implications of such appropriations on future funding requirements.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support, the core contention may revolve around the appropriateness of immediate funding without further evaluation or discussion regarding the state’s financial position. Opponents might argue that continual emergency appropriations could signal a lack of long-term fiscal planning, potentially leading to further strains on the budget. Nonetheless, the urgency articulated in the bill focuses on alleviating immediate pressures faced by the claimants, making it a contentious but timely measure.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB251

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA SB1481

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA AB2755

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA SB383

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA SB939

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA SB1355

Claims against the state: appropriation.

CA AB1773

Claims against the state.

CA SB418

Claims against the state: appropriation.