California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3220

Introduced
2/16/24  
Introduced
2/16/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Refer
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Report Pass
3/21/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/23/24  
Report Pass
4/23/24  
Refer
4/23/24  
Refer
4/23/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/8/24  
Engrossed
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/16/24  
Refer
5/16/24  
Refer
5/16/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/20/24  
Refer
6/24/24  

Caption

Marine resources: Department of Fish and Wildlife: authority: mariculture.

Impact

If enacted, AB 3220 is expected to revitalize California's mariculture industry by clarifying the definition of mariculture and streamlining regulatory processes. By increasing transparency and communication with legislative committees regarding the state verification efforts, the bill aims to support local aquaculture businesses while ensuring their activities contribute positively to marine conservation efforts. This legislative change may also reinforce California’s commitment to becoming a leader in sustainable food production amidst growing climate challenges and food insecurity.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3220, introduced by Assembly Member Papan, focuses on enhancing the regulatory framework surrounding mariculture in California. The bill aims to empower the Department of Fish and Wildlife to seek state verification authority from federal agencies, specifically the United States Army Corps of Engineers, to expedite the review and approval of federal permits for mariculture projects. By facilitating this process, the bill seeks to promote sustainable shellfish and seaweed production while addressing environmental concerns, particularly those related to climate change and the degradation of marine ecosystems.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 3220 appears largely positive among advocates for sustainable food sources and marine restoration. Many stakeholders, including environmentalists and local aquaculture operators, express optimism that this bill can accelerate marine restoration efforts and improve coastal resiliency. Nonetheless, some uncertainties remain concerning how increased registration fees might burden smaller operators or deter new entrants into the mariculture sector, potentially leading to mixed feelings within the industry.

Contention

While AB 3220 is championed as a means to foster sustainability, there are points of contention, chiefly regarding the financial implications for aquaculture businesses in the form of increased registration fees for obtaining state verification authority. Critics may argue that escalating costs could inhibit participation in the mariculture industry, especially for smaller operators. Additionally, concerns may arise regarding potential overregulation or the adequacy of environmental protections inherent in the new streamlined permitting processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB303

Aquaculture: mariculture production and restoration: pilot program.

CA SB1093

Mariculture: master permitting program: designation of suitable state waters.

CA SB939

Emergencies: COVID-19: commercial tenancies: evictions.

CA SB69

Ocean Resiliency Act of 2019.

CA AB2162

Shellfish and seaweed operations: marine restoration projects.

CA SB262

Marine resources: commercial fishing and aquaculture: regulation of operations.

FL H1187

Carbon Sequestration

FL H1063

Carbon Sequestration