California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3260

Introduced
2/16/24  
Introduced
2/16/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Refer
4/2/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Refer
5/8/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/13/24  
Report Pass
6/13/24  
Refer
6/13/24  
Refer
6/13/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Refer
6/27/24  
Refer
8/5/24  

Caption

Health care coverage: reviews and grievances.

Impact

The passage of AB3260 would have significant implications for existing state laws governing health care coverage and consumer protection. By formalizing the processes for grievances, the bill would likely enhance protections for patients and potentially lead to more equitable outcomes in disputes with insurers. This could result in a reduction of arbitrary claim denials and strengthen accountability within the health care system. Additionally, the bill may align state regulations with best practices derived from national standards for health care grievance procedures.

Summary

AB3260, referred to as the health care coverage review and grievances bill, is designed to address issues surrounding the review processes and grievance mechanisms for health care coverage. This legislation aims to establish a more streamlined and transparent framework for individuals seeking recourse against their health care providers or insurers. The bill emphasizes the importance of patient rights and empowers individuals to contest denied claims more effectively, ensuring that they have a clear path for grievances related to their health care coverage.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB3260 appears to be positive, particularly among patient advocates and consumer protection groups who view the bill as a necessary step toward improving health care access and accountability. Supporters argue that this legislation is crucial for empowering consumers by providing them with the resources needed to challenge unfair practices in the health care system. However, there may be some concern from insurers regarding compliance costs and operational adjustments which might be required if the bill is enacted.

Contention

While there is strong support for the bill, notable points of contention could arise particularly from stakeholders within the insurance industry, who may cite concerns about the operational impacts and costs associated with implementing the new grievance protocols. Additionally, there may be debates about the scope of the bill and whether it sufficiently addresses all necessary aspects of health care coverage or if it could inadvertently lead to excessive burdens on health care providers. Ensuring a balanced approach that protects consumers while considering the feasibility for insurers will be a critical aspect of the ongoing discussions surrounding AB3260.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06557

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Legislative Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Health Carrier Utilization Review And Grievance Process.

CT SB00410

An Act Concerning Adverse Determination Reviews.

CA AB1802

Health care service plans.

CA AB1268

Health care coverage: prospective review.

CT SB01158

An Act Concerning Utilization Review, Grievances And External Appeals Processes Of Health Carriers.

CT HB06586

An Act Concerning Prior Authorizations And Health Care Provider Contracts.

CT SB00006

An Act Concerning Utilization Review And Health Care Contracts, Health Insurance Coverage For Newborns And Step Therapy.

MD HB932

Health Insurance - Utilization Review - Revisions