California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB498

Introduced
2/7/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Introduced
2/7/23  
Introduced
2/7/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/2/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Report Pass
4/3/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Refer
3/6/23  
Refer
4/4/23  
Report Pass
4/3/23  
Engrossed
5/1/23  
Refer
4/4/23  
Refer
4/4/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Engrossed
5/1/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Chaptered
5/22/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Enrolled
5/11/23  
Chaptered
5/22/23  
Passed
5/22/23  

Caption

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

Impact

The impact of AB 498 on state laws primarily pertains to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The bill stipulates that certain actions related to the compact ratification will not be deemed projects under CEQA, thus exempting them from typical environmental review processes. This provision reflects a respect for tribal sovereignty while also facilitating more rapid implementation of gaming projects, which proponents argue will bolster economic stability and self-sufficiency for the tribe as well as benefit surrounding communities.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 498, introduced by Assemblymember Aguiar-Curry, ratifies the tribal-state gaming compact between the State of California and the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, executed on March 9, 2023. This bill is significant as it aligns with federal standards outlined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, which permits tribes to operate specific types of gaming on their lands. The ratification of this compact not only formalizes the agreement but also addresses and streamlines the relationship between the state and the Graton Rancheria concerning gaming operations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 498 appears to be supportive, particularly among stakeholders invested in the economic welfare of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria. Supporters argue that the compact will enhance economic opportunities for the tribe while also positively impacting local economies. However, some critics may express concerns regarding potential environmental implications and the balance of regulatory authority between state and tribal governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to AB 498 include the implications of exempting certain tribal actions from CEQA. Critics argue that this might set a precedent for further legislative measures that could diminish environmental protections or reduce community input in the regulatory process. Advocates for tribal gaming highlight the necessity of such provisions to ensure that tribal sovereignty is honored and that the tribe can effectively manage its economic interests without undue state interference.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1212

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB736

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB559

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA AB957

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA SB771

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.

CA AB1333

Tribal gaming: compact ratification: Susanville Indian Rancheria.

CA SB49

Tribal gaming: compact and amendment ratification.

CA SB900

Tribal gaming: compact ratification.