California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB636

Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Introduced
2/9/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Refer
2/17/23  
Report Pass
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/13/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Report Pass
4/26/23  
Engrossed
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/18/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Enrolled
9/5/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Enrolled
9/5/23  
Enrolled
9/5/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Passed
10/8/23  

Caption

Employers: agricultural employees: required disclosures.

Impact

The legislation addresses a significant gap in the information previously available to H-2A workers, who may be new to the state and unfamiliar with their rights under California law. By mandating disclosures in languages accessible to these workers, such as Spanish, the bill seeks to enhance the protection of vulnerable agricultural employees by equipping them with necessary information about wages, hours, and safety. This could particularly influence how agricultural employers navigate compliance with state regulations, ensuring better job visibility and security for these workers.

Summary

Assembly Bill 636, recently approved in California, amends Section 2810.5 of the Labor Code, primarily impacting the rights and protections of agricultural employees, particularly those employed under the federal H-2A visa program. The bill mandates that employers provide specific written notices at the time of hiring. This notice must include information regarding wages, work conditions, and importantly, details about any federal or state disaster declarations that may affect the employee's health and safety. The aim is to ensure that agricultural workers are well-informed about their rights and the circumstances surrounding their employment, especially in light of recent emergencies.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 636 appears positive, especially among labor advocates and worker protection groups, who see this as a step forward in safeguarding the interests of agricultural workers. However, some opposing viewpoints suggest that the additional regulatory burdens on employers could complicate hiring and employment practices in the agricultural sector, highlighting a tension between protecting worker rights and ensuring employer flexibility. The debate reflects the complexities of agricultural employment, where the balance between fair labor practices and economic realities is continuously negotiated.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily revolve around the implementation of the notice requirements, particularly regarding how small or family-operated farms will manage compliance. Critics argue that the added requirements may lead to confusion or even unintentional violations, placing smaller employers at a disadvantage. Ultimately, AB 636 substantially revises the responsibilities of employers in relation to their H-2A workforce, potentially shifting traditional practices in California's agricultural industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB857

Employers: Labor Commissioner: required disclosures.

CA SB1102

Employers: Labor Commissioner: required disclosures.

CA SB295

Farm labor contractors: sexual harassment prevention.

CA AB2915

Attorney General: farmworkers: sexual assault and harassment.

CA AB107

State government.