California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB722

Introduced
2/13/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Introduced
2/13/23  
Introduced
2/13/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Engrossed
5/8/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Report Pass
3/29/23  
Engrossed
5/8/23  
Engrossed
5/8/23  
Refer
5/9/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Refer
5/9/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Refer
5/17/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Enrolled
9/6/23  
Report Pass
7/13/23  
Chaptered
9/30/23  
Enrolled
9/6/23  
Enrolled
9/6/23  
Chaptered
9/30/23  
Passed
9/30/23  

Caption

Alameda Health System Hospital Authority.

Impact

This bill directly impacts the operations of the Alameda Health System, mandating that incumbents in recognized collective bargaining units must maintain service provision without involuntarily replaced. This shift underscores the county's commitment to uphold job security for healthcare workers while aiming to ensure the provision of quality medical care to its vulnerable communities. The legislation further solidifies the hospital authority's accountability and autonomy over management decisions, which include governance, reporting, and overall service administration.

Summary

Assembly Bill 722 (AB722), introduced by Assemblymember Bonta, amends Section 101850 of the Health and Safety Code concerning the Alameda Health System Hospital Authority. It establishes parameters for the management and governance of medical services in Alameda County by creating an independent hospital authority intended to enhance the overall effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare services provided at the county's medical center. The new legislation extends the prohibition on contracting out medical services performed by employed physicians and surgeons until January 1, 2035, which seeks to protect existing healthcare jobs while improving care delivery for the county's underserved populations.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding AB722 appears supportive among healthcare professionals and advocacy organizations who appreciate the focus on job preservation and maintaining quality of care within the community. Supporters argue that the extended prohibition on outsourcing medical services ensures a stable workforce and continuity of care for patients. However, there are concerns from some fiscal conservatives who worry about the implications of extended job security measures potentially leading to inefficiencies and less competitive healthcare operations.

Contention

The primary contention revolves around the balance between adequate healthcare provision and fiscal responsibility. Critics argue that the mandates imposed by AB722 could lead to inefficiencies by limiting the ability of the hospital authority to contract out services that could be provided more effectively or at a lower cost by external agencies. Additionally, discussions about the need for flexibility in governance to adapt to changing healthcare markets are at the forefront of the debate, as some view the prohibition against contracting as a potential hindrance to innovation and improved service delivery in healthcare.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB924

Alameda Health System: hospital authority.

CA AB1538

Alameda Health System Hospital Authority: physician services.

CA AB474

California Public Records Act: conforming revisions.

CA AB2438

California Public Records Act: conforming revisions.

CA AB1200

Whistleblower protection.

CA SB1029

North Coast Railroad Authority.

CA SB1504

Public employment: retirement savings plans, employment conditions, and training.

CA AB526

County employees’ retirement: districts: retirement system governance.