California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB910

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
4/10/23  
Report Pass
4/10/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Engrossed
5/11/23  
Engrossed
5/11/23  
Refer
5/11/23  
Refer
5/11/23  
Refer
5/24/23  
Refer
5/24/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Enrolled
9/12/23  
Enrolled
9/12/23  
Chaptered
10/10/23  
Passed
10/10/23  

Caption

County officers: auditors: qualifications.

Impact

By enhancing the documentation requirements for candidates, AB 910 significantly transforms the qualifications for county auditors in California. It stipulates that candidates must present comprehensive proof of their educational and professional credentials, alongside a declaration under penalty of perjury that the submitted information is accurate. Furthermore, the bill eliminates certain previously required qualifications, such as the necessity of a certificate related to college semester units in relevant subjects, which may streamline the qualification process while maintaining necessary standards.

Summary

Assembly Bill 910, introduced by Wilson, amends various sections of the Elections Code and the Government Code relating to the qualifications of county officers, specifically auditors. The bill broadens the documentation required for a candidate's declaration, now requiring college transcripts along with other qualifications to ensure transparency in the qualifications of candidates for county offices. This shift aims to reinforce the standards for eligibility in public service roles connected with finance and auditing responsibilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 910 appears generally favorable among advocates of increased scrutiny and eligibility standards for public office holders. Proponents argue that such measures not only enhance credibility but also protect public trust in county financial operations. Critics, however, may view the increased requirements as potentially limiting and cumbersome, particularly for capable candidates who may find it challenging to meet extensive documentation criteria. Overall, the bill underscores a commitment to accountability in appointing individuals to vital financial oversight roles.

Contention

Despite its reception, some contention exists regarding the balance between increased scrutiny and the accessibility of candidacy for county office. While supporters argue that these changes contribute to better governance, detractors might argue that overly stringent requirements could deter qualified individuals from entering public service. The enforcement of perjury declarations adds another layer, as it introduces potential legal ramifications for candidates, emphasizing the serious nature of the documentation provided.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB271

Juries.

CA AB1784

Primary elections: candidate withdrawals.

CA AB2528

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign statements.

CA SB766

Social workers.

CA AB1795

Primary elections: dual candidacies.

CA SB288

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions: transportation-related projects.

CA SB802

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB3284

Elections omnibus bill.