California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB932

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Refer
3/2/23  
Report Pass
3/15/23  
Report Pass
3/15/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
3/30/23  
Report Pass
3/30/23  
Refer
4/3/23  
Refer
4/3/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Engrossed
5/30/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
6/7/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Enrolled
8/17/23  
Enrolled
8/17/23  
Chaptered
9/8/23  
Chaptered
9/8/23  
Passed
9/8/23  

Caption

Accessory dwelling units: Accessory Dwelling Unit Program: reports.

Impact

The introduction of AB932 will have significant implications for state laws concerning housing. By ensuring that CalHFA conducts a thorough assessment of the Accessory Dwelling Unit Program, lawmakers aim to improve the framework that supports the creation of more residential units. This is expected to ultimately facilitate greater access to affordable housing, particularly in urban areas where housing shortages are prevalent. The requirement for a formal evaluation allows for data-driven decision-making, potentially leading to amendments in future policies that govern housing finance and land use in California.

Summary

Assembly Bill 932, also known as AB932, focuses on the Accessory Dwelling Unit Program administered by the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA). The bill mandates CalHFA to undertake an evaluation of the program, specifically looking into the efficacy of loans provided to homeowners for constructing accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units. By requiring a comprehensive report to the Legislature by January 1, 2025, AB932 aims to enhance the accessibility of financing options for homeowners considering the development of these additional living spaces, which is a crucial aspect of California's housing strategy.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding AB932 appears to be positive, particularly among housing advocates and urban planners who see the value in bolstering the availability of accessory dwelling units as a means to address the housing crisis. By promoting the construction of these units, supporters argue that the bill fosters greater community resilience and environmental sustainability. However, there might be some concerns about whether the existing infrastructure can support the increased density associated with additional housing units, leading to discussions about urban planning and resource allocation.

Contention

While AB932 is largely viewed as a step forward in housing policy, there are points of contention regarding the potential impacts of accessory dwelling units on local neighborhoods. Critics worry about issues like loss of neighborhood character or strain on local services as more families and individuals move into areas that may not be equipped to handle increased population density. The evaluation mandated by the bill aims to address these concerns by collecting data on the impact of such programs, which may help in alleviating fears through informed policymaking and community engagement.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A4370

Concerns development of accessory dwelling units and related municipal land use regulations.

NJ S2347

Concerns development of accessory dwelling units and related municipal land use regulations.

HI HB1730

Relating To Housing.

CA AB670

Common interest developments: accessory dwelling units.

CA AB3126

Department of Transportation: state highway property: information requests.

HI HB1170

Relating To Housing.

HI HB1170

Relating To Housing.

HI HB2333

Relating To Housing.