California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB978

Introduced
2/15/23  
Introduced
2/15/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Refer
2/23/23  
Report Pass
4/4/23  
Report Pass
4/4/23  
Refer
4/5/23  
Refer
4/5/23  
Failed
2/1/24  

Caption

California Environmental Quality Act: housing projects: judicial review: bonds.

Impact

The passage of AB 978 is expected to have significant implications for the approval and development of housing projects under CEQA. By placing financial barriers on individuals looking to challenge agency decisions, the bill may streamline the approval process for housing developments, potentially leading to increased construction. However, it also raises concerns about access to justice, as the bond requirement may disproportionately affect less wealthy citizens or community organizations that might wish to contest a project on environmental or community-impact grounds.

Summary

Assembly Bill 978, introduced in the California Legislature, aims to amend the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by introducing a bond requirement for individuals seeking judicial review of decisions made by public agencies related to housing projects. The bill stipulates that any party wishing to contest a housing project must post a bond between $500,000 and $1,000,000, intended to cover potential costs and damages incurred by the project during the review. This legislative move is seen as a measure to deter frivolous lawsuits and facilitate housing development in California, a state grappling with severe housing shortages.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding the bill is mixed. Proponents argue that it encourages economic development by reducing the number of baseless challenges against housing projects, thus facilitating the much-needed construction in urban areas suffering from a housing crisis. Conversely, opponents express worries that this bill undermines public scrutiny and citizen involvement in the environmental review process, potentially leading to unchecked development and negative consequences for local communities and ecosystems.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bond amount, which some critics consider excessively high and likely to limit the ability of everyday citizens to contest projects they believe may harm their communities. The debate over AB 978 highlights a fundamental tension in California's housing policy: the need for more housing supply versus the imperative to maintain robust environmental protections and community rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2445

California Environmental Quality Act: affordable housing: judicial review: bonds.

CA AB1610

State highways: Hollywood Central Park: environmental quality.

CA AB2706

California Environmental Quality Act: record of proceedings.

CA AB2736

Groundwater: pumped hydroelectric energy storage systems: Joshua Tree National Park.

CA SB337

West Coyote Hills Conservancy Program.

CA AB706

Forest Organic Residue, Energy, and Safety Transformation and Wildfire Prevention Fund Act.

CA AB2257

State lands: oil and gas leases: cost study.

CA AB902

School facilities: alternative design-build contracts.