California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AJR18 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Assembly Joint Resolution No. 18 CHAPTER 179 Relative to nuclear fuel. [ Filed with Secretary of State August 23, 2024. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAJR 18, Davies. Spent nuclear fuel: storage.This measure would urge the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for spent nuclear fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation, and would urge Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO Bill TextWHEREAS, California is home to four de facto interim spent nuclear fuel storage sites: the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in the County of San Luis Obispo, the Humboldt Bay Power Plant in the County of Humboldt, the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station in the County of Sacramento, and the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in the County of San Diego; andWHEREAS, Spent nuclear fuel can be safely stored at reactor sites for decades, but communities in the vicinity of these and other commercial nuclear plants never consented to the long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel; andWHEREAS, Twelve United States commercial nuclear power reactors have been permanently closed over the last decade and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission licenses for 85 of the nations 92 commercial nuclear reactors are scheduled to expire by 2050, stranding spent nuclear fuel and hampering efforts to restore sites for other productive uses; andWHEREAS, The United States inventory of spent nuclear fuel from commercial reactors now exceeds 90,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU) located at 76 sites in 34 states; andWHEREAS, The amount of spent nuclear fuel is projected to increase nationwide at an average rate of approximately 1,800 MTU per year, accumulating an estimated 137,000 MTU by 2050, nearly twice the statutory limit for storing spent fuel at the only permanent disposal facility, known as a deep geologic repository, authorized to accept spent nuclear fuel in the United States; andWHEREAS, The federal government has failed to meet its obligation to assume title, liability, and transportation of spent nuclear fuel now stranded in California and 33 other states as it was required to beginning in 1998, under the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425) and by contract; andWHEREAS, More than a decade has passed since the bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future issued its final report providing recommendations regarding siting future nuclear waste management facilities and options for waste disposal, and little progress has been made toward implementing its recommendations; andWHEREAS, As of September 2020, the General Accounting Office reports that since the year 2000, all taxpayers in the United States have been forced to pay $9,000,000,000 in damages for costs incurred to store spent nuclear fuel at reactor sites, and that these costs will grow to as much as $30,600,000,000, until the federal government provides a consolidated interim storage facility or a deep geologic repository and takes custody of the spent nuclear fuel; andWHEREAS, Nuclear utility customers have prepaid $46,000,000,000, including interest income, into the federal Nuclear Waste Fund for the development of storage and disposal facilities, including $2,000,000,000 from California customers; andWHEREAS, Assembly Joint Resolution 29 of the 201516 Regular Session, Relative to the Interim Consolidated Storage Act of 2015, adopted unanimously by the Assembly and the Senate, urged the passage of federal legislation to authorize interim consolidated storage and give priority for storage to high-level nuclear waste and spent nuclear fuel located on a site without an operating nuclear reactor, and called upon the United States Department of Energy to implement the prompt and safe relocation of spent nuclear fuel from the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station to a licensed and regulated interim consolidated storage facility; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of California, jointly, That the Legislature of the State of California respectfully urges the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for the spent fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation; and, be it furtherResolved, That the Legislature of the State of California respectfully urges the 118th Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action on the recommendations contained in the final report of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future by developing the necessary statutory and regulatory framework, including revisions to the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the President of the United States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, to each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the United States, to the Chairs and Ranking Members of the United States Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and to the Secretary of Energy.
1+Enrolled August 19, 2024 Passed IN Senate August 15, 2024 Passed IN Assembly August 05, 2024 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Joint Resolution No. 18Introduced by Assembly Member Davies(Coauthors: Assembly Members Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Megan Dahle, Dixon, Essayli, Flora, Mike Fong, Gallagher, Garcia, Gipson, Haney, Hart, Hoover, Jones-Sawyer, Lackey, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mathis, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Pacheco, Papan, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Santiago, Schiavo, Ta, Valencia, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, and Zbur)(Coauthor: Senator Blakespear)May 09, 2024 Relative to nuclear fuel. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAJR 18, Davies. Spent nuclear fuel: storage.This measure would urge the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for spent nuclear fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation, and would urge Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO Bill TextWHEREAS, California is home to four de facto interim spent nuclear fuel storage sites: the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in the County of San Luis Obispo, the Humboldt Bay Power Plant in the County of Humboldt, the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station in the County of Sacramento, and the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in the County of San Diego; andWHEREAS, Spent nuclear fuel can be safely stored at reactor sites for decades, but communities in the vicinity of these and other commercial nuclear plants never consented to the long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel; andWHEREAS, Twelve United States commercial nuclear power reactors have been permanently closed over the last decade and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission licenses for 85 of the nations 92 commercial nuclear reactors are scheduled to expire by 2050, stranding spent nuclear fuel and hampering efforts to restore sites for other productive uses; andWHEREAS, The United States inventory of spent nuclear fuel from commercial reactors now exceeds 90,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU) located at 76 sites in 34 states; andWHEREAS, The amount of spent nuclear fuel is projected to increase nationwide at an average rate of approximately 1,800 MTU per year, accumulating an estimated 137,000 MTU by 2050, nearly twice the statutory limit for storing spent fuel at the only permanent disposal facility, known as a deep geologic repository, authorized to accept spent nuclear fuel in the United States; andWHEREAS, The federal government has failed to meet its obligation to assume title, liability, and transportation of spent nuclear fuel now stranded in California and 33 other states as it was required to beginning in 1998, under the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425) and by contract; andWHEREAS, More than a decade has passed since the bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future issued its final report providing recommendations regarding siting future nuclear waste management facilities and options for waste disposal, and little progress has been made toward implementing its recommendations; andWHEREAS, As of September 2020, the General Accounting Office reports that since the year 2000, all taxpayers in the United States have been forced to pay $9,000,000,000 in damages for costs incurred to store spent nuclear fuel at reactor sites, and that these costs will grow to as much as $30,600,000,000, until the federal government provides a consolidated interim storage facility or a deep geologic repository and takes custody of the spent nuclear fuel; andWHEREAS, Nuclear utility customers have prepaid $46,000,000,000, including interest income, into the federal Nuclear Waste Fund for the development of storage and disposal facilities, including $2,000,000,000 from California customers; andWHEREAS, Assembly Joint Resolution 29 of the 201516 Regular Session, Relative to the Interim Consolidated Storage Act of 2015, adopted unanimously by the Assembly and the Senate, urged the passage of federal legislation to authorize interim consolidated storage and give priority for storage to high-level nuclear waste and spent nuclear fuel located on a site without an operating nuclear reactor, and called upon the United States Department of Energy to implement the prompt and safe relocation of spent nuclear fuel from the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station to a licensed and regulated interim consolidated storage facility; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of California, jointly, That the Legislature of the State of California respectfully urges the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for the spent fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation; and, be it furtherResolved, That the Legislature of the State of California respectfully urges the 118th Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action on the recommendations contained in the final report of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future by developing the necessary statutory and regulatory framework, including revisions to the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository; and be it furtherResolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the President of the United States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, to each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the United States, to the Chairs and Ranking Members of the United States Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and to the Secretary of Energy.
22
3- Assembly Joint Resolution No. 18 CHAPTER 179 Relative to nuclear fuel. [ Filed with Secretary of State August 23, 2024. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAJR 18, Davies. Spent nuclear fuel: storage.This measure would urge the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for spent nuclear fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation, and would urge Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO
3+ Enrolled August 19, 2024 Passed IN Senate August 15, 2024 Passed IN Assembly August 05, 2024 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Joint Resolution No. 18Introduced by Assembly Member Davies(Coauthors: Assembly Members Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Megan Dahle, Dixon, Essayli, Flora, Mike Fong, Gallagher, Garcia, Gipson, Haney, Hart, Hoover, Jones-Sawyer, Lackey, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mathis, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Pacheco, Papan, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Santiago, Schiavo, Ta, Valencia, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, and Zbur)(Coauthor: Senator Blakespear)May 09, 2024 Relative to nuclear fuel. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAJR 18, Davies. Spent nuclear fuel: storage.This measure would urge the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for spent nuclear fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation, and would urge Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository.Digest Key Fiscal Committee: NO
44
5- Assembly Joint Resolution No. 18 CHAPTER 179
5+ Enrolled August 19, 2024 Passed IN Senate August 15, 2024 Passed IN Assembly August 05, 2024
66
7- Assembly Joint Resolution No. 18
7+Enrolled August 19, 2024
8+Passed IN Senate August 15, 2024
9+Passed IN Assembly August 05, 2024
810
9- CHAPTER 179
11+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20232024 REGULAR SESSION
12+
13+ Assembly Joint Resolution
14+
15+No. 18
16+
17+Introduced by Assembly Member Davies(Coauthors: Assembly Members Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Megan Dahle, Dixon, Essayli, Flora, Mike Fong, Gallagher, Garcia, Gipson, Haney, Hart, Hoover, Jones-Sawyer, Lackey, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mathis, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Pacheco, Papan, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Santiago, Schiavo, Ta, Valencia, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, and Zbur)(Coauthor: Senator Blakespear)May 09, 2024
18+
19+Introduced by Assembly Member Davies(Coauthors: Assembly Members Alanis, Alvarez, Arambula, Bains, Bauer-Kahan, Bennett, Berman, Boerner, Bryan, Calderon, Juan Carrillo, Cervantes, Chen, Megan Dahle, Dixon, Essayli, Flora, Mike Fong, Gallagher, Garcia, Gipson, Haney, Hart, Hoover, Jones-Sawyer, Lackey, Low, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mathis, McKinnor, Muratsuchi, Stephanie Nguyen, Pacheco, Papan, Jim Patterson, Joe Patterson, Pellerin, Petrie-Norris, Quirk-Silva, Ramos, Rendon, Reyes, Luz Rivas, Robert Rivas, Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio, Sanchez, Santiago, Schiavo, Ta, Valencia, Villapudua, Waldron, Wallis, Ward, Weber, Wicks, Wilson, Wood, and Zbur)(Coauthor: Senator Blakespear)
20+May 09, 2024
1021
1122 Relative to nuclear fuel.
12-
13- [ Filed with Secretary of State August 23, 2024. ]
1423
1524 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
1625
1726 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
1827
1928 AJR 18, Davies. Spent nuclear fuel: storage.
2029
2130 This measure would urge the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for spent nuclear fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation, and would urge Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository.
2231
2332 This measure would urge the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for spent nuclear fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation, and would urge Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository.
2433
2534 ## Digest Key
2635
2736 ## Bill Text
2837
2938 WHEREAS, California is home to four de facto interim spent nuclear fuel storage sites: the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in the County of San Luis Obispo, the Humboldt Bay Power Plant in the County of Humboldt, the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station in the County of Sacramento, and the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in the County of San Diego; and
3039
3140 WHEREAS, Spent nuclear fuel can be safely stored at reactor sites for decades, but communities in the vicinity of these and other commercial nuclear plants never consented to the long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel; and
3241
3342 WHEREAS, Twelve United States commercial nuclear power reactors have been permanently closed over the last decade and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission licenses for 85 of the nations 92 commercial nuclear reactors are scheduled to expire by 2050, stranding spent nuclear fuel and hampering efforts to restore sites for other productive uses; and
3443
3544 WHEREAS, The United States inventory of spent nuclear fuel from commercial reactors now exceeds 90,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU) located at 76 sites in 34 states; and
3645
3746 WHEREAS, The amount of spent nuclear fuel is projected to increase nationwide at an average rate of approximately 1,800 MTU per year, accumulating an estimated 137,000 MTU by 2050, nearly twice the statutory limit for storing spent fuel at the only permanent disposal facility, known as a deep geologic repository, authorized to accept spent nuclear fuel in the United States; and
3847
3948 WHEREAS, The federal government has failed to meet its obligation to assume title, liability, and transportation of spent nuclear fuel now stranded in California and 33 other states as it was required to beginning in 1998, under the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425) and by contract; and
4049
4150 WHEREAS, More than a decade has passed since the bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future issued its final report providing recommendations regarding siting future nuclear waste management facilities and options for waste disposal, and little progress has been made toward implementing its recommendations; and
4251
4352 WHEREAS, As of September 2020, the General Accounting Office reports that since the year 2000, all taxpayers in the United States have been forced to pay $9,000,000,000 in damages for costs incurred to store spent nuclear fuel at reactor sites, and that these costs will grow to as much as $30,600,000,000, until the federal government provides a consolidated interim storage facility or a deep geologic repository and takes custody of the spent nuclear fuel; and
4453
4554 WHEREAS, Nuclear utility customers have prepaid $46,000,000,000, including interest income, into the federal Nuclear Waste Fund for the development of storage and disposal facilities, including $2,000,000,000 from California customers; and
4655
4756 WHEREAS, Assembly Joint Resolution 29 of the 201516 Regular Session, Relative to the Interim Consolidated Storage Act of 2015, adopted unanimously by the Assembly and the Senate, urged the passage of federal legislation to authorize interim consolidated storage and give priority for storage to high-level nuclear waste and spent nuclear fuel located on a site without an operating nuclear reactor, and called upon the United States Department of Energy to implement the prompt and safe relocation of spent nuclear fuel from the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station to a licensed and regulated interim consolidated storage facility; now, therefore, be it
4857
4958 Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of California, jointly, That the Legislature of the State of California respectfully urges the Congress of the United States to prioritize fulfilling the federal governments legal and contractual obligation to provide a home for the spent fuel within California and 33 other states across the nation; and, be it further
5059
5160 Resolved, That the Legislature of the State of California respectfully urges the 118th Congress and the United States Department of Energy to take action on the recommendations contained in the final report of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Americas Nuclear Future by developing the necessary statutory and regulatory framework, including revisions to the federal Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, to permit the relocation of the spent nuclear fuel in California and elsewhere to consolidated interim storage and ultimately a permanent repository; and be it further
5261
5362 Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of this resolution to the President of the United States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, to each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress of the United States, to the Chairs and Ranking Members of the United States Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and to the Secretary of Energy.