California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1020

Introduced
2/6/24  
Introduced
2/6/24  
Refer
2/14/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Report Pass
4/16/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Refer
4/16/24  
Engrossed
5/20/24  
Engrossed
5/20/24  
Refer
5/28/24  
Refer
5/28/24  
Report Pass
6/18/24  
Report Pass
6/18/24  
Refer
6/18/24  
Refer
6/18/24  
Report Pass
7/2/24  
Report Pass
7/2/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Vetoed
9/25/24  

Caption

Law enforcement agency regulations: shooting range targets.

Impact

The bill's passage will amend the Penal Code by adding Section 13658, thus mandating changes in training policies for law enforcement. Agencies will need to enact new protocols that explicitly forbid ethnic targets, which may require them to purchase new, compliant targets. Additionally, the legislation includes a provision for reimbursing local agencies for any costs incurred due to these new requirements, aligning with the California Constitution's mandate for state-mandated local programs.

Summary

Senate Bill 1020, introduced by Senator Bradford, aims to address the use of ethnic shooting targets in law enforcement training. The bill requires law enforcement agencies and basic course presenters to implement policies that prohibit the use of such targets for any associated training, qualification, or competition activities. This measure follows concerns regarding the potential reinforcement of racial biases during law enforcement education and training sessions, seeking to promote a more neutral training environment.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 1020 appears to be supportive of the bill's goals in promoting inclusivity and reducing the potential for racial bias in law enforcement training. Advocates argue that such a measure is crucial in fostering better community relations and improving the perception of police practices among diverse communities. However, some law enforcement groups may view this change as an unnecessary burden on training budgets and operations, potentially indicating a division in stakeholder perspectives.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the practical implications for law enforcement agencies regarding the transition from traditional targets to more neutral options. Critics of the bill may question the effectiveness of prohibiting ethnic targets in genuinely altering biases in police behavior. Additionally, as agencies prepare to implement these changes, they will need to manage the logistical and financial challenges that accompany shifting long-standing training practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB490

Law enforcement agency policies: arrests: positional asphyxia.

CA AB2621

Law enforcement training.

CA SB766

Relating to the liability of a sport shooting range and the regulation of firearms, ammunition, firearm supplies, and sport shooting ranges.

CA SB978

Law enforcement agencies: public records.

CA AB3071

Lead ammunition: shooting ranges.

CA HB1595

Relating to the liability of a sport shooting range and the regulation of firearms, ammunition, firearm supplies, and sport shooting ranges.

CA AB642

Law enforcement agencies: facial recognition technology.

CA AB48

Law enforcement: use of force.

CA HB0141

Target Shooting Regulations

CA SB345

Law enforcement agencies: public records.

Similar Bills

CA AB1607

Gender discrimination: notification.

CA SB1313

Vehicle equipment: driver monitoring defeat devices.

CA AB1798

Schoolbuses: passenger restraint systems.

CA SB294

Health care coverage: independent medical review.

CA SB1372

Airports: third-party vendors: security lanes.

CA AB535

Olive oil: labeling.

CA SB336

State grant programs: negotiated indirect cost rates.

CA AB2735

English learners: participation in standard instructional program.