California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB532

Introduced
2/14/23  
Introduced
2/14/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Refer
3/30/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/24/23  
Report Pass
4/24/23  
Refer
4/25/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/22/23  
Refer
6/22/23  
Refer
6/22/23  
Refer
6/29/23  
Refer
6/29/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Refer
7/6/23  
Refer
6/10/24  
Refer
6/10/24  
Refer
6/13/24  
Refer
6/13/24  
Refer
6/17/24  
Refer
6/17/24  
Refer
6/25/24  
Report Pass
7/2/24  
Report Pass
7/2/24  
Refer
7/2/24  
Refer
7/2/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Report Pass
7/3/24  
Refer
8/26/24  
Refer
8/26/24  
Refer
8/26/24  
Refer
8/26/24  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Enrolled
8/29/24  
Chaptered
9/28/24  
Passed
9/28/24  

Caption

Parking payment zones.

Impact

The enactment of SB 532 is expected to enable local governments to better adapt to modern payment preferences and enhance the convenience for residents and visitors needing parking. By permitting mobile payments, local authorities can also decrease the need for physical parking meters, which can often be limiting and burdensome. This shift aims to improve access and user experience while generating insights through required evaluations on accessibility, equity, and costs associated with these payment zones.

Summary

Senate Bill 532, sponsored by Senator Wiener, introduces provisions for mobile device payment in parking payment zones specifically in the Cities of San Francisco, Long Beach, and Santa Monica, allowing local authority to mandate payment by mobile devices until January 1, 2033. The legislation shifts from a previous prohibition on mobile payment for parking fees, and requires the development of accessible and equitable cash payment plans alongside the mobile options. This bill is framed around making parking payments more flexible and modernized, acknowledging the increasing reliance on technology in everyday transactions.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 532 appears to be positive among supporters who view it as a necessary modernization of the parking payment system in urban environments. The inclusion of provisions aimed at ensuring equitable access through cash payment alternatives reflects an awareness of potential disparities in technology use among different populations. However, there may be concerns regarding the transaction fees associated with mobile payments and the potential for increased surveillance through technology, which could raise privacy issues.

Contention

Notably, there is a structure for civil fines under the new mobile device parking zones, where fines for failing to pay are reduced to half compared to traditional metered parking violations. Critics may express concerns about the effectiveness of enforcement and the need for local authorities to engage thoroughly with community stakeholders to tailor their plans effectively. The impending evaluations required as part of the bill's provisions will be crucial in assessing the practical impacts of these changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1837

San Francisco Bay area: public transit: Regional Network Management Council.

CA AB1272

Department of Motor Vehicles: occupational licensees.

CA AB2057

San Francisco Bay area: public transportation.

CA AB990

Water quality: waste discharge requirements: infill housing projects.

CA AB1605

City and County of San Francisco: Crooked Street Reservation and Pricing Program.

CA SB63

San Francisco Bay area: local revenue measure: transportation funding.

CA AB629

San Francisco Bay area: public transportation.

CA SB1031

San Francisco Bay area: local revenue measure: transportation improvements.