Low-impact camping areas.
The bill has significant implications for local laws and tourism in California. It requires counties that permit low-impact camping areas to create a registry while enforcing standards for waste disposal, quiet hours, and overall environmental compliance. The introduction of a Rural Tourism Impact Fee, which is set to be 2% of the total booking cost for these camping areas starting January 1, 2026, provides a mechanism to funnel revenue into local tourism marketing efforts and environmental projects. This approach is aimed at enhancing the state's outdoor recreation economy while promoting sustainable practices.
Senate Bill 620, introduced by Senator McGuire, aims to establish a framework for low-impact camping areas across California. The bill modifies existing laws related to Special Occupancy Parks by specifying that low-impact camping areas do not fall under the same requirements. It allows private property owners to offer transient occupancy rental for camping, subject to certain regulations that ensure sanitary conditions and noise control. Notably, this legislation seeks to facilitate outdoor recreational opportunities while generating tourism revenue.
The general sentiment surrounding SB 620 appears to be supportive, particularly among proponents of rural tourism and outdoor activities. Advocates argue that the bill will aid in increasing access to affordable camping options, benefiting local economies. However, there are concerns among critics about potential regulatory gaps and the adequacy of local enforcement of health and safety standards. The urgency of the bill, declared necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace and health, suggests a strong legislative push for its quick adoption.
One notable point of contention involves the provisions related to the enforcement of regulations and the effectiveness of local oversight for low-impact camping areas. Critics fear that without adequate enforcement mechanisms, the quality and safety of these areas could be compromised. Additionally, there are discussions around the financial implications for local governing bodies tasked with implementing these regulations, and whether the anticipated revenue from the Rural Tourism Impact Fees will sufficiently cover the administrative costs associated with overseeing the new camping framework.