The bill mandates that the California Victim Compensation Board approve or deny compensation applications within an accelerated timeframe—no more than 30 days on average and 60 days at the longest. Additionally, it removes the current stipulation that applicants must cooperate with law enforcement in order to qualify for compensation, thereby potentially broadening access to assistance for victims of crime who may be hesitant to engage with the police.
Senate Bill 655, introduced by Senator Durazo and co-authored by Senator Skinner, aims to amend several sections of the Government Code concerning victim compensation in California. The bill proposes significant modifications to the definitions used within victim compensation laws, including redefining 'derivative victim' and introducing a new category for 'victim of violent crime advocate.' It also seeks to streamline the application process for victims seeking compensation, emphasizing timely responses and reducing bureaucratic delays.
Critics of the bill express concerns regarding the removal of certain restrictions, particularly the provisions that deny compensation to individuals with violent felony convictions and those whose involvement in crimes affects their eligibility. By eliminating these requirements, the bill could lead to increased costs for the compensation fund and raise questions about the accountability of applicants claiming compensation. Supporters, however, argue this is a necessary shift towards a more compassionate approach that acknowledges the diverse circumstances surrounding victims of crime.
SB 655 also introduces provisions to establish a presumption of substantial hardship for victims applying for emergency awards related to relocation and funeral expenses. Furthermore, it loosens verification processes, allowing the board to accept various forms of evidence without requiring exhaustive documentation, thus making it easier for victims to receive aid in a timely manner.