California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB701

Introduced
2/16/23  
Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/21/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Enrolled
8/31/23  
Enrolled
8/31/23  
Chaptered
10/7/23  
Passed
10/7/23  

Caption

Fruit and vegetable wholesalers: registration fees.

Impact

The passage of SB 701 will likely lead to an increase in funding for county-level enforcement actions and inspections of wholesalers. By removing the design requirement for the fee schedule, the bill empowers counties to independently determine registration fees that could better reflect the actual costs of administration and enforcement of prevailing agricultural regulations. It may also provide counties with more revenue flexibility, enhancing their capacity to conduct necessary inspections of fruit and vegetable businesses, thus ensuring compliance with quality and safety standards.

Summary

Senate Bill 701, introduced by Hurtado, aims to amend the regulations surrounding fruit and vegetable wholesalers within California's Food and Agricultural Code. The legislation allows the board of supervisors of any county—regardless of its population size—to require registration from wholesalers of fresh fruits and vegetables and to set an annual registration fee. The previously existing limit for this fee set by counties with populations over 6,000,000 was capped at $250; this bill raises the maximum possible registration fee to $500, simplifying the fee structure by allowing counties discretion in its establishment without the previous requirement to cap fees at one-third of enforcement costs.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment around SB 701 appears to be supportive, particularly among those in the agricultural sector who believe that greater local control and the ability to set appropriate fees will lead to better regulatory oversight. However, concerns may arise from smaller counties regarding the potential burden of increased fees on business operations. The bill reflects an effort to adapt to the needs of the agricultural economy by modernizing regulations governing food wholesaling, which may benefit from state-level support.

Contention

One point of contention that emerged during discussions on SB 701 is the potential for larger counties to impose higher fees on wholesalers, which could disproportionately affect smaller businesses and create barriers to entry in the market. Additionally, there may be debates about how counties choose to allocate the funds collected through these registration fees. Critics might argue that an increase in regulation could lead to excessive financial burdens on small to mid-sized wholesalers, leading to discussions on the balance between regulation and business sustainability in agricultural trade.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A5480

Permits certain winery license holders to sell Department of Agriculture "Secretary Select" wine under certain circumstances.

NJ A724

Permit holder of rectifier and blender license to engage in certain retail sales.

NJ A5258

Permits certain wineries to sell their products by the glass for consumption in licensed salesrooms.

NJ S4112

Permits certain wineries to sell their products by the glass for consumption in licensed salesrooms.

NJ A871

Establishes license to allow wineries that produce more than 250,000 gallons per year to directly ship wine to consumers.

NJ A5068

Permits Department of Agriculture to regulate sale and distribution of hemp-derived consumable products under certain circumstances.

NJ A940

Permits certain breweries, wineries, cideries, meaderies, and distilleries to sell each other's products on licensed premises.

NJ A5259

Permits certain winery license holders to sell wine produced by other winery licensees under certain circumstances; establishes supplemental wine production facility license.