California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB819

Introduced
2/17/23  
Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/1/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Refer
4/13/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Report Pass
4/20/23  
Refer
4/24/23  
Engrossed
5/4/23  
Engrossed
5/4/23  
Refer
5/11/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Report Pass
8/16/23  
Report Pass
8/16/23  
Refer
8/27/24  
Refer
8/27/24  
Enrolled
8/31/24  
Enrolled
8/31/24  
Chaptered
9/22/24  
Passed
9/22/24  

Caption

Medi-Cal: certification.

Impact

The passage of SB 819 would significantly impact the operation of clinics within California, particularly those that operate on a limited schedule or provide mobile health services. By exempting certain clinics from the Medi-Cal enrollment procedures, the bill facilitates easier access for these clinics to offer services to qualified individuals without the hurdles of extensive administrative compliance. This is particularly beneficial for communities with limited healthcare access, enhancing the delivery of care to those in need.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 819, introduced by Senator Eggman, aims to amend Section 14043.15 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, specifically focusing on the certification of clinics within the Medi-Cal program. The bill clarifies existing exemptions for intermittent sites and mobile health care units operated by government-run or license-exempt clinics from the stringent enrollment procedures typically required under the Medi-Cal system. This proposed change is intended to streamline operations and reduce bureaucratic burdens on clinics that serve low-income patients through mobile or intermittent access points.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 819 appears to lean positive, especially among healthcare providers and advocates for accessible health services. Supporters argue that the bill promotes efficient healthcare delivery and acknowledges the vital role mobile clinics play in underserved areas. However, there may be some concerns regarding oversight and regulation, with opponents arguing that easing certification requirements might compromise service quality.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between facilitating healthcare access and maintaining regulatory standards that ensure patient safety and quality care. Critics might express concern about potential overreach or lax enforcement of health regulations due to the exemptions provided to clinics under this bill. The debate reflects broader discussions on how best to manage healthcare resources while ensuring adequate oversight.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2428

Federally qualified health centers: rural health clinics.

CA AB1494

Medi-Cal: telehealth: state of emergency.

CA SB502

Medi-Cal: children: mobile optometric office.

CA AB2576

Emergencies: health care.

CA AB1122

Commercial harbor craft: equipment.

CA SB323

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health centers: Drug Medi-Cal and specialty mental health services.

CA AB1524

Medi-Cal: provider enrollment.

CA AB543

Medi-Cal: street medicine.

CA AB770

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health clinics: rural health clinics.

CA AB3344

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics.

Similar Bills

CA AB2428

Federally qualified health centers: rural health clinics.

CA SB502

Medi-Cal: children: mobile optometric office.

CA AB1122

Commercial harbor craft: equipment.

CA AB1534

California State Board of Optometry: optometry: opticianry.