California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2428

Introduced
2/14/18  
Introduced
2/14/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Report Pass
5/9/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/30/18  
Report Pass
6/19/18  
Report Pass
6/19/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Refer
7/2/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Report Pass
8/17/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Report Pass
8/28/18  
Report Pass
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Enrolled
8/31/18  
Chaptered
9/26/18  
Chaptered
9/26/18  

Caption

Federally qualified health centers: rural health clinics.

Impact

The bill's implications for state law are significant as it reduces bureaucratic barriers for healthcare providers within the Medi-Cal system. By allowing FQHCs and RHCs to add new licensed locations without undergoing the full enrollment process, the bill intends to encourage these centers to expand their services. This could enhance healthcare accessibility for low-income populations, aligning with the state’s goal of expanding Medi-Cal coverage and increasing the number of patients these facilities can serve.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2428, introduced by Gonzalez Fletcher, amends the Welfare and Institutions Code regulations regarding the Medi-Cal program, especially concerning federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and rural health clinics (RHCs). The bill proposes to simplify the enrollment process for these facilities by exempting them from needing to re-register additional physical plants under certain conditions. This change is intended to streamline operations for primary care clinics adding new locations or services, thereby potentially improving access to healthcare in underserved areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2428 appears to be generally positive among supporters, particularly those advocating for improved healthcare access. Proponents argue that the bill represents a crucial step towards promoting efficiency and responsiveness in the healthcare system for vulnerable populations. However, there may also be concerns about how these changes will be implemented and monitored, especially regarding service quality at new locations or plants added by existing facilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may include discussions about ensuring quality of care as more locations open without the usual enrollment checks. Some stakeholders may worry that expediting the enrollment process could lead to a reduction in oversight, potentially affecting the standard of care provided to patients. There could also be varying opinions on whether the changes adequately address the needs of different communities, particularly in rural versus urban settings, where healthcare needs can differ significantly.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1591

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health centers: licensed professional clinical counselor.

CA SB1125

Federally qualified health center and rural health clinic services.

CA SB323

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health centers: Drug Medi-Cal and specialty mental health services.

CA AB3344

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics.

CA SB66

Medi-Cal: federally qualified health center and rural health clinic services.

CA AB2029

Federally Qualified Health Clinics: rural health clinics.

CA SB966

Federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics: visits.

CA AB2164

Telehealth.