Federal constitutional convention: firearms.
Should SJR7 be successful, it will pave the way for significant changes to gun laws across the nation. It proposes a set of common-sense regulations including universal background checks for firearm purchases, restrictions on sales to individuals under 21, implemented waiting periods before firearm transfer, and a prohibition on the transfer of assault weapons to civilians. These measures reflect California's ongoing commitment to reducing gun violence and enhancing public safety.
Senate Joint Resolution No. 7 (SJR7), introduced by Senator Wahab, proposes that California apply to the United States Congress to call a federal constitutional convention under Article V of the U.S. Constitution. The purpose of this convention is to propose an amendment related to firearms and public safety regulations. The bill aims to affirm the right of federal, state, and local governments to implement regulations governing aspects of firearms usage, including acquisition, possession, and public carrying. Furthermore, it seeks to ensure that such regulations align with the Second Amendment.
The sentiment surrounding SJR7 is largely polarized. Proponents argue that the bill addresses urgent public safety concerns stemming from gun violence, citing distressing statistics about gun-related deaths in the U.S. They believe that the proposed regulations are essential to mitigating risks associated with firearms. Conversely, critics, especially from pro-gun advocates, view the bill as a potential infringement on Second Amendment rights and an overreach of government power, suggesting that it may encroach upon individual liberties regarding gun ownership.
A key point of contention within discussions about SJR7 revolves around the potential ramifications of a constitutional convention. Critics express concern about the risks associated with a convention, including the fear that it might lead to amendments that not only affect gun legislation but could also open the door to broader changes to the Constitution itself. Supporters emphasize that the resolution is specifically limited to issues surrounding firearms, aiming to prevent Congress from pursuing unrelated amendments.