California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1332

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/21/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Refer
5/29/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/1/25  
Refer
7/1/25  
Report Pass
7/7/25  
Refer
7/7/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Refer
7/17/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/11/25  

Caption

Medicinal cannabis: shipments.

Impact

The bill is significant in its implications for state laws governing the medicinal cannabis industry, particularly concerning local regulations. By stripping local jurisdictions of the authority to restrict cannabis deliveries, AB 1332 seeks to streamline access for patients in need of specific cannabis products that might not be available in their area. The bill acknowledges the existing access crisis faced by a small but vulnerable population of patients in California, particularly those with severe medical conditions who may not have viable options for obtaining the necessary medicinal cannabis products. This legislation demonstrates a proactive stance by the state to ensure patient needs are prioritized and met through appropriate legislative measures.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1332, introduced by Assembly Member Ahrens, is aimed at improving access to medicinal cannabis for patients who face challenges in obtaining necessary products through traditional retail channels. The bill amends the Medicinal Cannabis Patients Right of Access Act to prohibit local jurisdictions from enacting regulations that prevent the delivery or shipment of medicinal cannabis to patients, particularly by licensed microbusinesses. It allows these businesses to ship specific medicinal cannabis products directly to patients, provided they meet certain criteria, such as shipping only to patients who cannot procure them locally and adhering to possession limits. This provision is set to remain effective until January 1, 2029, unless a new amendment is introduced to extend it further.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding AB 1332 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for patient rights and those in the medicinal cannabis industry who believe that enhanced access to cannabis is crucial for health care. However, as with many cannabis-related bills, there may be opposition from local government entities concerned about losing regulatory control. Nevertheless, many constituents and stakeholders view the effort as necessary to eliminate barriers that affect patient care, highlighting a positive reception among groups advocating for medical cannabis access.

Contention

Despite the support for AB 1332, notable contention could arise concerning the balance between state authority and local self-governance. The prohibition against local regulations that could restrict deliveries of medicinal cannabis may be perceived by some as overreach, potentially disempowering local governments from addressing community-specific concerns. Furthermore, the requirement for licensed microbusinesses to verify physician recommendations introduces additional responsibilities that could lead to unintended complications, such as enforcing compliance and navigating the complexities of legal regulations. This balance of interests represents a fundamental debate as California moves to further refine its cannabis regulatory landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB1064

Cannabis: operator and separate premises license types: excessive concentration of licenses.

CA AB471

Cannabis catering.

CA AB2555

Sales and use tax: exemption: medicinal cannabis: donations.

CA AB1207

Cannabis: labeling and advertising.

CA SB512

Cannabis: taxation: gross receipts.

CA AB1610

Cannabis: Department of Cannabis Control.

CA SB540

Cannabis and cannabis products: health warnings.

CA AB687

California Cannabis Authority.

CA AB1111

Cannabis: small producer event sales license.

CA AB420

Cannabis: industrial hemp.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.