California Assembly Bill AB1384

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/25
• Refer: 3/13/25
• Report Pass: 4/8/25
• Engrossed: 4/21/25
• Refer: 4/21/25
• Refer: 5/7/25

Caption

Summary proceedings for obtaining possession of real property: procedural requirements.

Impact

The proposed changes in AB 1384 signify a targeted approach to handling eviction proceedings, especially in the context of residential tenancies. By limiting the conditions under which a court can delay hearings, the bill seeks to expedite the legal process for landlords seeking possession of their property. Proponents believe this will lead to less prolonged litigation and a more efficient resolution of housing disputes, which is particularly relevant in times of housing shortages. On the contrary, critics may argue that this limitation could potentially disadvantage tenants by reducing their opportunity to contest wrongful evictions.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1384, introduced by Assembly Member Nguyen, amends Section 1170 of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning summary proceedings for obtaining possession of real property. This legislation primarily addresses the procedural requirements for unlawful detainer actions, which involve the eviction of tenants. Under existing law, there are stipulations regarding timelines for filing complaints and motions, specifically mandating that hearings occur within a designated timeframe. The bill aims to refine these timelines by allowing the courts to set a later hearing date only in cases pertaining to residential tenancies for motions to demur or strike a complaint.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 1384 may arise from the balance it seeks to strike between landlord rights and tenant protections. While the bill's apparent focus on efficiency aligns with a growing demand for quicker resolutions in the face of a housing crisis, it raises concerns among tenant advocacy groups who fear that expedited proceedings might compromise tenants' rights to fair legal representation. The implications of these amendments could lead to broader discussions on housing policy and the necessary safeguards for renters facing eviction.