California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1423

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  

Caption

Transportation electrification: charging station uptime: regulations: violations.

Impact

The proposed legislation is set to significantly impact state laws governing electric vehicles and charging infrastructure. By altering the duration and scope of uptime reporting requirements, AB 1423 aims to ensure that state-funded or incentivized electric vehicle charging stations remain operational and accessible. This move is considered crucial in promoting public confidence in electric vehicle infrastructure, essential for supporting the state's climate goals and increasing electric vehicle adoption rates. Furthermore, it will introduce an administrative enforcement process for violations of these uptime standards, with civil penalties for non-compliance.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1423, introduced by Assembly Member Irwin, aims to enhance transportation electrification by establishing comprehensive uptime recordkeeping and reporting standards for electric vehicle chargers and charging stations. The bill modifies existing laws, mandating that the California Energy Commission, in collaboration with the Public Utilities Commission, develop these standards to ensure that all electric vehicle charging infrastructure meets specified uptime requirements. Notably, standards will apply for a minimum of six years for chargers that received state agency incentives or were funded through ratepayer charges.

Sentiment

Feedback from the legislative discussions surrounding AB 1423 reflects a generally supportive sentiment, particularly among environmental advocates and electric vehicle proponents who see the bill as a step forward in improving the reliability of charging stations. However, some stakeholders have raised concerns about the potential implementation costs for charging station operators and the administrative burden that may arise from new compliance requirements. Balancing operational feasibility with environmental objectives appears to be a focal topic in the ongoing deliberations related to this bill.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the enforcement mechanisms and potential penalties associated with non-compliance. The bill stipulates that violations can incur administrative civil penalties up to $2,500, raising discussions about the adequacy of these measures in ensuring compliance across diverse charging station providers. Critics argue that such penalties may disproportionately affect smaller operators, while proponents contend that they are necessary to maintain high operational standards across the state’s electric vehicle charging network.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2697

Transportation electrification: electric vehicle charging stations: network roaming standards.

CA AB2061

Transportation electrification: electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

CA AB126

Vehicular air pollution: Clean Transportation Program: vehicle registration and identification plate service fees: smog abatement fee: extension.

CA AB2563

Air pollution: permits: mobile fueling on-demand tank vehicles.

CA AB3313

Mandatory training: employment laws.

CA AB2940

Vehicle emissions.

CA SB767

Educational technology: Digital Education Equity Program: regional consortia: State Digital Equity Plan.

CA AB1321

Education finance: fiscal transparency.