California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1430

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
3/17/25  
Refer
3/18/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Report Pass
5/14/25  
Engrossed
5/23/25  
Refer
5/23/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Report Pass
6/18/25  
Refer
6/18/25  

Caption

County recorders: fees.

Impact

If enacted, AB1430 will have a significant impact on state laws related to how counties manage their recording fees. By allowing for increased fees, the bill aims to address budgetary challenges faced by counties that have not had their recording fees adjusted since 2010. This change is intended to ensure that county recorders can provide essential services effectively while complying with inflationary pressures. The bill will also eliminate provisions set to expire in 2026 regarding fees for archival mediums, thereby securing ongoing funding for these preservation efforts indefinitely.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1430, introduced by Assembly Member Bennett, focuses on amending the Government Code regarding fees charged by county recorders. Currently, the law restricts recording fees to a maximum of $10 for the first page and $3 for each subsequent page. AB1430 proposes to increase these fees to $15 for the first page and $4 for each additional page. The bill also stipulates that these funds should solely benefit the county recorder’s office for operational costs, rather than being partially diverted to the county general fund as is the current practice.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB1430 appears supportive from those within the county recorder's offices and some legislative members who recognize the need for financial adjustments to meet operational demands. However, there may be concerns from certain stakeholders about increasing the costs to the public. The discussion highlights the balancing act between maintaining affordable access for document recording while ensuring sufficient funding for county services.

Contention

Notably, one of the points of contention is the potential financial impact on residents who utilize county recording services. Critics may argue that increasing fees could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals or small businesses that require frequent access to these services. The bill's supporters will need to address these concerns convincingly, emphasizing that the increase is necessary to maintain the quality and efficiency of critical county services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2980

Fictitious business names: county recorder: statements: blockchain technology.

CA AB2004

County recorder: recordation of documents.

CA SB937

Development projects: fees and charges.

CA AB1758

Court records: fees.

CA AB1193

Real property: property records: personal identifying information.

CA SB564

Sheriffs and marshals: fees.

CA AB918

Health care district: County of Imperial.

CA AB1957

Public contracts: best value construction contracting for counties.

CA SB889

California Department of Tax and Fee Administration: earnings withholding orders: settlement agreements: excise taxes.

CA SB888

Political Reform Act of 1974.

Similar Bills

CA AB212

Counties: recording fees.

CA AB1466

Real property: discriminatory restrictions.

CA AB137

State government.

CA SB137

State government.

CA AB1741

Healing arts: clinical laboratories: personnel.

CA AB481

Healing arts: clinical laboratories: personnel.

CA SB409

Pharmacy practice: testing.

CA AB1363

Preschool: dual language learners.