California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1652

Introduced
1/28/26  
Refer
2/17/26  
Report Pass
3/10/26  
Refer
3/10/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  
Engrossed
4/16/26  

Caption

State agencies: regulations and legislation: nondisclosure agreements.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1652 will enforce stricter controls over the conditions under which state officials may engage in confidentiality agreements. By voiding any NDAs that would typically govern communication during the legislative or regulatory process, the bill reinforces the principle that such discussions should be publicly accessible. Exceptions within the bill relate primarily to the protection of trade secrets and proprietary information, thus balancing the need for transparency with legitimate privacy concerns. This legislative change may lead to an adjustment in how state officers communicate regarding regulatory matters.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1652, introduced by Assembly Member Patterson, seeks to address the use of nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) by elective or appointive officers within state agencies. The bill specifically prohibits these officials from entering into NDAs concerning the drafting, negotiation, or discussion of proposed regulations or legislation. This measure aims to enhance transparency in governmental operations, ensuring that discussions about regulatory frameworks remain open to public scrutiny and do not shroud important legislative matters in secrecy.

Contention

Notably, the introduction of AB 1652 may provoke discussions about the limits of state officials' discretion in regulating confidentiality. While advocates argue that the bill promotes accountability and public trust in state governance, opponents may raise concerns about the potential chilling effect on candid discussions critical to effective governance. The fear among some stakeholders is that restricting NDAs could hinder honest exchanges and reduce the willingness of individuals to engage with state officials when sensitive matters arise. This balance between transparency and functional governance remains a central point of contention as the bill progresses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB994

Local agencies: nondisclosure agreements.

CA AB1370

State Legislature: nondisclosure agreements.

CA HB1507

Limiting health care nondisclosure agreements.

CA HB695

Prohibit nondisclosure agreements for certain local officials

CA HB1264

Nondisclosure agreements in economic development.

CA HB1104

Nondisclosure agreements in economic development.

CA H10

Relative to nondisclosure agreements

CA HF4659

State and municipalities prohibited from entering into nondisclosure agreements.

CA SB01035

An Act Concerning Limitations On The Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements.

CA SB00355

An Act Concerning Limitations On The Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements.

Similar Bills

CA SB994

Local agencies: nondisclosure agreements.

CA AB1370

State Legislature: nondisclosure agreements.

AZ SB1510

nondisclosure agreements; information; prohibition

LA SB185

Provides that nondisclosure agreements involving victims of child sexual abuse are against public policy and unenforceable. (gov sig) (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

MI HB4052

Legislature: legislators; certain nondisclosure agreements entered into by legislators; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4053'25

MI HB4053

Legislature: legislators; certain nondisclosure agreements entered into by legislators; prohibit. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 4053'25

MI HB5399

Public employees and officers: other; local officials signing nondisclosure agreements related to the construction of data centers; prohibit. Creates new act.

OH HB695

Prohibit nondisclosure agreements for certain local officials