California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB506

Introduced
2/10/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  
Refer
4/8/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Refer
5/7/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
6/17/25  
Refer
6/17/25  
Report Pass
6/19/25  
Refer
6/19/25  
Report Pass
6/23/25  
Refer
6/23/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/10/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  

Caption

Pets: sales of dogs, cats, and rabbits.

Impact

The bill builds upon existing legislation, specifically the Lockyer-Polanco-Farr Pet Protection Act, enhancing consumer protection frameworks and accountability within pet sales. By enforcing strict disclosure requirements and invalidating contracts that impose nonrefundable deposits, AB 506 aims to foster transparency and ethical behavior among sellers. This shift is expected to empower consumers and contribute positively to the welfare of pets by ensuring that buyers are well-informed before making purchases.

Summary

Assembly Bill 506, introduced by Assembly Member Bennett, aims to regulate the sales of pets, specifically dogs, cats, and rabbits, within California. It mandates that any person, pet dealer, or business involved in the sale disclose vital information regarding the pet's origin, medical history, and vaccination records to potential buyers. Starting January 1, 2026, any contract that requires a nonrefundable deposit will be considered void under California's public policy, thereby protecting consumers from potential financial losses related to transactions that could become void.

Sentiment

Sentiment toward AB 506 appears predominantly positive within advocacy groups concerned with animal rights and consumer protection, who argue that the bill represents a necessary move toward greater accountability in the pet industry. However, there may be mixed responses from pet dealers and businesses that perceive the new regulations as overly restrictive or detrimental to their operations. The discussions surrounding the bill indicate a broader societal concern for both consumer rights and animal welfare.

Contention

Despite its positive reception, AB 506 is not without contention. Critics have expressed concerns about the implications of banning nonrefundable deposits, arguing that this could unfairly disadvantage small pet dealers and affect the financial viability of legitimate businesses. Moreover, sellers may worry about the punitive aspects of civil liability for violations, which can impose significant risks on them. Balancing the interests of consumers and businesses will be vital in the ongoing discussions surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2248

Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.

CA AB2425

Bowie’s Law: animals: adoption, shelter overcrowding, and breeding.

CA AB240

Dogs and cats: California Spay-Neuter Fund.

CA AB2232

Accessibility to emergency information and services: emergency shelters: persons with pets.

CA AB1518

Service dogs.

CA SB1494

Local agencies: Sales and Use Tax: retailers.

CA AB595

Animal shelters: 72-hour public notice: euthanasia: study.

CA AB2867

Recovery of artwork and personal property lost due to persecution.

CA AB491

Local government: fines and penalties.

CA AB332

Rabies control data.

Similar Bills

CA AB2248

Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.

CA SB43

Substance use disorder: addiction treatment referral agencies.

CA AB3281

Judiciary omnibus.

CA SB345

Health care services: legally protected health care activities.

CA AB1946

Public safety: mentally disordered individuals: diversion.

CA AB1491

Sales of dogs and cats: contracts.

CA AB310

Wealth tax.

CA AB1694

Foster care payments: income.