California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB506 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Amended IN Assembly April 01, 2025 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 506Introduced by Assembly Member Bennett(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Berman)(Principal coauthor: Senator Umberg)February 10, 2025An act to add Section 1670.13 to the Civil Code, relating to contracts. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 506, as amended, Bennett. Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.Existing law generally regulates formation and enforcement of contracts, including what constitutes an unlawful contract. Existing law provides that, except as provided, a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat in which ownership is contingent upon the making of payments over a period of time subsequent to the transfer of possession of the dog or cat is void as against public policy. Existing law provides that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, for the lease of a dog or cat that provides for or offers the option of transferring ownership of the dog or cat at the end of the lease term is void as against public policy.This bill would provide that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker, as defined, and where the buyer is located in California, is void as against public policy if specified conditions are met, including that the contract requires a nonrefundable deposit. The bill would require a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California to include specified information, including that the broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract. The bill would authorize any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin a person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates the above-described provisions. The bill would authorize a buyer harmed by a violation to bring a civil action pursuant to that provision against any person in violation of the above-described provisions, and would entitle a prevailing plaintiff to reasonable attorneys fees and costs. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor to enforce these provisions on behalf of a petpurchaser. pet purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The bill would require, if money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to these provisions, the seller to refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void without expectation that the buyer return the contract subject. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions are to be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as specified.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1670.13 is added to the Civil Code, to read:1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The authority provided to the Attorney General public prosecutor by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this This section shall not be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
1+CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 506Introduced by Assembly Member Bennett(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Berman)(Principal coauthor: Senator Umberg)February 10, 2025An act to add Section 1670.13 to the Civil Code, relating to contracts. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 506, as introduced, Bennett. Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.Existing law generally regulates formation and enforcement of contracts, including what constitutes an unlawful contract. Existing law provides that, except as provided, a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat in which ownership is contingent upon the making of payments over a period of time subsequent to the transfer of possession of the dog or cat is void as against public policy. Existing law provides that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, for the lease of a dog or cat that provides for or offers the option of transferring ownership of the dog or cat at the end of the lease term is void as against public policy.This bill would provide that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker, as defined, and where the buyer is located in California, is void as against public policy if specified conditions are met, including that the contract requires a nonrefundable deposit. The bill would require a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California to include specified information, including that the broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract. The bill would authorize any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin a person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates the above-described provisions. The bill would authorize a buyer harmed by a violation to bring a civil action pursuant to that provision against any person in violation of the above-described provisions, and would entitle a prevailing plaintiff to reasonable attorneys fees and costs. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General to enforce these provisions on behalf of a pet purchaser. The bill would require, if money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to these provisions, the seller to refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void without expectation that the buyer return the contract subject. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions are to be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as specified.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1670.13 is added to the Civil Code, to read:1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. The authority provided to the Attorney General by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
22
3- Amended IN Assembly April 01, 2025 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 506Introduced by Assembly Member Bennett(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Berman)(Principal coauthor: Senator Umberg)February 10, 2025An act to add Section 1670.13 to the Civil Code, relating to contracts. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 506, as amended, Bennett. Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.Existing law generally regulates formation and enforcement of contracts, including what constitutes an unlawful contract. Existing law provides that, except as provided, a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat in which ownership is contingent upon the making of payments over a period of time subsequent to the transfer of possession of the dog or cat is void as against public policy. Existing law provides that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, for the lease of a dog or cat that provides for or offers the option of transferring ownership of the dog or cat at the end of the lease term is void as against public policy.This bill would provide that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker, as defined, and where the buyer is located in California, is void as against public policy if specified conditions are met, including that the contract requires a nonrefundable deposit. The bill would require a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California to include specified information, including that the broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract. The bill would authorize any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin a person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates the above-described provisions. The bill would authorize a buyer harmed by a violation to bring a civil action pursuant to that provision against any person in violation of the above-described provisions, and would entitle a prevailing plaintiff to reasonable attorneys fees and costs. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor to enforce these provisions on behalf of a petpurchaser. pet purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The bill would require, if money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to these provisions, the seller to refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void without expectation that the buyer return the contract subject. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions are to be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as specified.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
3+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 506Introduced by Assembly Member Bennett(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Berman)(Principal coauthor: Senator Umberg)February 10, 2025An act to add Section 1670.13 to the Civil Code, relating to contracts. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 506, as introduced, Bennett. Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.Existing law generally regulates formation and enforcement of contracts, including what constitutes an unlawful contract. Existing law provides that, except as provided, a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat in which ownership is contingent upon the making of payments over a period of time subsequent to the transfer of possession of the dog or cat is void as against public policy. Existing law provides that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, for the lease of a dog or cat that provides for or offers the option of transferring ownership of the dog or cat at the end of the lease term is void as against public policy.This bill would provide that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker, as defined, and where the buyer is located in California, is void as against public policy if specified conditions are met, including that the contract requires a nonrefundable deposit. The bill would require a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California to include specified information, including that the broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract. The bill would authorize any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin a person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates the above-described provisions. The bill would authorize a buyer harmed by a violation to bring a civil action pursuant to that provision against any person in violation of the above-described provisions, and would entitle a prevailing plaintiff to reasonable attorneys fees and costs. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General to enforce these provisions on behalf of a pet purchaser. The bill would require, if money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to these provisions, the seller to refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void without expectation that the buyer return the contract subject. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions are to be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as specified.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
44
5- Amended IN Assembly April 01, 2025
65
7-Amended IN Assembly April 01, 2025
6+
7+
88
99 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION
1010
1111 Assembly Bill
1212
1313 No. 506
1414
1515 Introduced by Assembly Member Bennett(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Berman)(Principal coauthor: Senator Umberg)February 10, 2025
1616
1717 Introduced by Assembly Member Bennett(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Berman)(Principal coauthor: Senator Umberg)
1818 February 10, 2025
1919
2020 An act to add Section 1670.13 to the Civil Code, relating to contracts.
2121
2222 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2323
2424 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2525
26-AB 506, as amended, Bennett. Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.
26+AB 506, as introduced, Bennett. Contracts: sales of dogs and cats.
2727
28-Existing law generally regulates formation and enforcement of contracts, including what constitutes an unlawful contract. Existing law provides that, except as provided, a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat in which ownership is contingent upon the making of payments over a period of time subsequent to the transfer of possession of the dog or cat is void as against public policy. Existing law provides that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, for the lease of a dog or cat that provides for or offers the option of transferring ownership of the dog or cat at the end of the lease term is void as against public policy.This bill would provide that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker, as defined, and where the buyer is located in California, is void as against public policy if specified conditions are met, including that the contract requires a nonrefundable deposit. The bill would require a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California to include specified information, including that the broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract. The bill would authorize any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin a person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates the above-described provisions. The bill would authorize a buyer harmed by a violation to bring a civil action pursuant to that provision against any person in violation of the above-described provisions, and would entitle a prevailing plaintiff to reasonable attorneys fees and costs. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor to enforce these provisions on behalf of a petpurchaser. pet purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The bill would require, if money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to these provisions, the seller to refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void without expectation that the buyer return the contract subject. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions are to be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as specified.
28+Existing law generally regulates formation and enforcement of contracts, including what constitutes an unlawful contract. Existing law provides that, except as provided, a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat in which ownership is contingent upon the making of payments over a period of time subsequent to the transfer of possession of the dog or cat is void as against public policy. Existing law provides that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, for the lease of a dog or cat that provides for or offers the option of transferring ownership of the dog or cat at the end of the lease term is void as against public policy.This bill would provide that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker, as defined, and where the buyer is located in California, is void as against public policy if specified conditions are met, including that the contract requires a nonrefundable deposit. The bill would require a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California to include specified information, including that the broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract. The bill would authorize any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin a person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates the above-described provisions. The bill would authorize a buyer harmed by a violation to bring a civil action pursuant to that provision against any person in violation of the above-described provisions, and would entitle a prevailing plaintiff to reasonable attorneys fees and costs. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General to enforce these provisions on behalf of a pet purchaser. The bill would require, if money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to these provisions, the seller to refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void without expectation that the buyer return the contract subject. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions are to be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as specified.
2929
3030 Existing law generally regulates formation and enforcement of contracts, including what constitutes an unlawful contract. Existing law provides that, except as provided, a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat in which ownership is contingent upon the making of payments over a period of time subsequent to the transfer of possession of the dog or cat is void as against public policy. Existing law provides that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2018, for the lease of a dog or cat that provides for or offers the option of transferring ownership of the dog or cat at the end of the lease term is void as against public policy.
3131
32-This bill would provide that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker, as defined, and where the buyer is located in California, is void as against public policy if specified conditions are met, including that the contract requires a nonrefundable deposit. The bill would require a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California to include specified information, including that the broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract. The bill would authorize any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin a person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates the above-described provisions. The bill would authorize a buyer harmed by a violation to bring a civil action pursuant to that provision against any person in violation of the above-described provisions, and would entitle a prevailing plaintiff to reasonable attorneys fees and costs. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor to enforce these provisions on behalf of a petpurchaser. pet purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction.
32+This bill would provide that a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker, as defined, and where the buyer is located in California, is void as against public policy if specified conditions are met, including that the contract requires a nonrefundable deposit. The bill would require a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California to include specified information, including that the broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract. The bill would authorize any court of competent jurisdiction to enjoin a person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates the above-described provisions. The bill would authorize a buyer harmed by a violation to bring a civil action pursuant to that provision against any person in violation of the above-described provisions, and would entitle a prevailing plaintiff to reasonable attorneys fees and costs. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General to enforce these provisions on behalf of a pet purchaser.
3333
3434 The bill would require, if money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to these provisions, the seller to refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void without expectation that the buyer return the contract subject. The bill would specify that nothing in its provisions are to be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as specified.
3535
3636 ## Digest Key
3737
3838 ## Bill Text
3939
40-The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1670.13 is added to the Civil Code, to read:1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The authority provided to the Attorney General public prosecutor by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this This section shall not be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
40+The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1670.13 is added to the Civil Code, to read:1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. The authority provided to the Attorney General by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
4141
4242 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4343
4444 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4545
46-SECTION 1. Section 1670.13 is added to the Civil Code, to read:1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The authority provided to the Attorney General public prosecutor by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this This section shall not be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
46+SECTION 1. Section 1670.13 is added to the Civil Code, to read:1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. The authority provided to the Attorney General by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
4747
4848 SECTION 1. Section 1670.13 is added to the Civil Code, to read:
4949
5050 ### SECTION 1.
5151
52-1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The authority provided to the Attorney General public prosecutor by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this This section shall not be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
52+1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. The authority provided to the Attorney General by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
5353
54-1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The authority provided to the Attorney General public prosecutor by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this This section shall not be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
54+1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. The authority provided to the Attorney General by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
5555
56-1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The authority provided to the Attorney General public prosecutor by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this This section shall not be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
56+1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.(b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:(1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.(2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.(c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:(1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.(2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit. (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.(e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).(f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.(1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.(2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.(g) The Attorney General shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. The authority provided to the Attorney General by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
5757
5858
5959
6060 1670.13. (a) For purposes of this section, broker means a person or business that (1) sells, (2) arranges, negotiates, or processes the sale of, or (3) facilitates the transfer of dogs or cats bred by another for profit.
6161
6262 (b) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, to transfer ownership of a dog or cat that is offered, negotiated, brokered, or otherwise arranged by a broker and where the buyer is located in California is void as against public policy if any of the following circumstances apply:
6363
6464 (1) The contract requires a nonrefundable deposit.
6565
6666 (2) The contract does not identify the original source of the dog or cat, including, but not limited to, the breeder.
6767
6868 (c) A contract entered into on or after January 1, 2026, between a broker and a buyer who is located in California shall include the following information:
6969
7070 (1) The broker is required to disclose the original source of the dog or cat involved in the contract.
7171
7272 (2) The broker is prohibited from requiring a nonrefundable deposit.
7373
7474 (d) If money has been exchanged pursuant to a contract that is void pursuant to this section, the seller shall refund the money to the buyer within 30 days of receiving notice that the contract is void pursuant to this section without expectation of return of the contract subject.
7575
7676 (e) A person shall not offer a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c).
7777
7878 (f) A person who offers a contract that contains a term that violates subdivision (b) or (c) may be enjoined by any court of competent jurisdiction.
7979
8080 (1) A buyer harmed by a violation may bring a civil action pursuant to this subdivision against any person in violation.
8181
8282 (2) A prevailing plaintiff in an action brought pursuant to this subdivision shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs.
8383
84-(g) The Attorney General General, a county counsel, a city attorney, or a city prosecutor shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. purchasers in a claim brought in the name of the people of the State of California in any court of competent jurisdiction. The authority provided to the Attorney General public prosecutor by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.
84+(g) The Attorney General shall have the authority to enforce this section on behalf of pet purchasers. The authority provided to the Attorney General by this section is not an exclusive remedy and does not affect any other relief or remedy provided by law.
8585
86-(h) Nothing in this This section shall not be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.
86+(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit a contract for the transfer of ownership of an animal by a governmental agency or the transfer of ownership of a guide, signal, or service dog, as defined in Section 54.1.