California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB75

Introduced
12/16/24  
Refer
2/3/25  
Report Pass
2/11/25  
Refer
2/12/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Refer
6/18/25  
Report Pass
7/1/25  
Refer
7/1/25  
Report Pass
7/10/25  
Refer
7/10/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  

Caption

Residential property insurance images.

Impact

The proposed legislation is expected to significantly impact state insurance regulations by ensuring that insurance companies cannot use outdated aerial images—those taken more than 180 days prior to any decision to terminate coverage—without proper verification through in-person inspection or alternative verification methods. By shifting the requirements around how insurance companies can evaluate properties, AB 75 is designed to protect policyholder interests and ensure that decisions regarding coverage are made based on current data.

Summary

Assembly Bill 75 (AB 75), introduced by Assembly Member Calderon, addresses the use of aerial images in the residential property insurance sector. The bill mandates that insurers inform policyholders about the possibility of aerial images being taken or obtained of their property during the policy period. This notification must be provided annually, along with guidelines on how policyholders can request these images. This measure aims to enhance transparency in the insurance underwriting process and give policyholders more control over their information.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around AB 75 appears to be positive among consumer advocacy groups, as it emphasizes consumer rights and promotes fairness in insurance practices. Supporters argue that this bill provides essential protections for homeowners, enabling them to dispute inaccurate assessments and verify the legitimacy of any images used to influence coverage decisions. Critics, however, may view additional regulations as cumbersome to insurers, potentially leading to increased administrative costs that could be passed on to consumers.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 75 may arise from the insurance companies who might view the additional disclosure requirements and limitations on utilizing aerial imagery as burdensome. The requirement for insurers to provide policyholders with the right to request aerial images and to verify those images through inspections could complicate the underwriting process, leading to concerns about operational efficiency. The bill represents a balancing act between enhancing consumer protection and enabling insurers to operate effectively in a competitive marketplace.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2416

Residential property insurance: wildfire risk.

CA SB505

Property insurance.

CA SB672

Residential property insurance.

CA AB1140

Insurance.

CA AB703

Residential property insurance: dog breeds.

CA AB905

Residential property insurance: Wildfire risk reporting penalties.

CA AB1095

Insurance: personal vehicle sharing.

CA SB611

Residential rental properties: fees and security.

CA AB919

Residential real property: sale of rental properties: right of first offer.

CA AB2743

Insurance: personal vehicle sharing.

Similar Bills

CA SB1242

Insurance.

CA AB1696

Insurance omnibus: developmental services.

CA AB1852

Property insurance.

CA AB3012

Residential property insurance.

CA AB2927

California Earthquake Authority.

CA SB260

Unmanned aircraft.