California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB868

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Refer
4/3/25  

Caption

Primary elections: county officers: top two candidates.

Impact

This bill is anticipated to significantly affect the voting dynamics in California, as it addresses long-standing issues of voter inequity, especially among underrepresented populations. Primary elections in California have historically seen lower turnout rates compared to general elections, particularly among younger individuals and communities of color. AB868 aims to mitigate this problem by ensuring that a more diverse group of candidates appear on the general election ballot, thereby promoting broader electoral engagement and representation. By imposing additional duties on counties, it establishes a state-mandated program that is subject to reimbursement, which could also have fiscal implications for local governments.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 868, introduced by Assembly Member Carrillo, proposes amendments to the California Elections Code, particularly focusing on the election processes for nonpartisan county officers. The bill seeks to exempt candidates for county nonpartisan offices from the current majority vote requirement to secure a position in the ensuing general election. Instead, it mandates that the top two candidates from the primary election will be placed on the general election ballot, aiming to enhance voter representation and participation in local governance.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around AB868 appears to be supportive among proponents who argue that it will enhance democratic participation and rectify imbalances in voter representation. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential administrative burdens placed on county election officials. Critics fear that mandated changes might complicate the local election administration processes. The bill reflects a commitment to increasing electoral access and fairness that resonates with the values of equity and inclusion in civic participation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications this bill might have for traditional voting patterns and how it could affect the decision-making autonomy of individual counties. Opponents argue that exempting certain county offices from the standard primary election process may undermine established electoral practices. Nevertheless, supporters posit that shifting to a top-two system for these offices could ultimately lead to a more representative government that reflects California's diverse demographic.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2207

Elections: no party preference voters: presidential primary ballots.

CA AB292

Primary elections: ballots.

CA AB773

Voter education: high school pupils.

CA AB681

Elections: voter registration: partisan primary elections.

CA AB2835

Elections: ballots.

CA AB331

Elections: duties of election officials: voter information guides.

CA AB1219

Elections: ballots.

CA AB623

Elections: printing requirements and ballot design.